SUPPORT FILMTRACKS! CLICK HERE FIRST:
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
iTunes (U.S.)
Amazon.ca
Amazon.fr
eBay (U.S.)
Amazon.de
Amazon.es
Half.com
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. Halloween
    2. Venom
   3. House With a Clock/Walls
  4. The Nun
 5. Crazy Rich Asians
6. The Meg
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. Solo: A Star Wars Story
        2. Batman
       3. Jurassic World: Kingdom
      4. The Predator
     5. Edward Scissorhands
    6. Mission: Impossible - Fallout
   7. Christopher Robin
  8. Apollo 13
 9. Ant-Man and the Wasp
10. The Equalizer 2
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for Chicago (Elfman/Kander/Ebb)

Edit | Delete
Re: Guys and Dolls
• Posted by: Andy   <Send E-Mail>
• Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2004, at 6:19 p.m.
• IP Address: webcacheb04a.cache.pol.co.uk
• In Response to: Re: Guys and Dolls (sarah)

When I first read that, I will admit, I got worried. But then I thought it through, and it's not so bad. I'm assuming (probably wrong, but never mind) that Mariah's up for Adelaide. If so, she should be OK, because all she really needs to do is belt out 'Adelaide's Lament', 'Bushel & a Peck', 'Take Back Your Mink' and 'Sue Me'. There's not a great deal of acting necessary other than being pissed off at Nathan. If she's being suggested as Sarah, however, we may have a problem. I just don't think she's up to the part. Fair enough, it's not intense Shakespeare or anthing, but it still requires some work.
She also doesn't strike me as capable of acting drunk whilst singing ('If I Were A Bell') without it looking totally stupid. She'd probably take the root of going out of control from alcohol, when it needs to be more that it's given her the courage to do what she's wanted to but been too afraid. But at least it's not Madonna, who I heard was suggested for Adelaide at one stage. And I agree, Nathan Lane must be Nathan Detroit. (Sorry for ranting for ages, but I have strong feelings about this. Problem is, they do tend to produce random streams of thought like this.)




Comments in this Thread:     Expand >>
  • Guys and Dolls  (6648 views)
       ButterflyDaydream - Monday, March 31, 2003, at 7:35 p.m.
    •    Re: Guys and Dolls  (6610 views)
         Mark - Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 12:58 a.m.
      •    Re: Guys and Dolls  (6506 views)
           MIKE - Monday, July 7, 2003, at 7:48 a.m.
      •    Re: Guys and Dolls  (6582 views)
           Jenny - Monday, June 16, 2003, at 11:05 a.m.
        •    Re: Guys and Dolls  (6797 views)
             Robyn - Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 7:06 a.m.
          •    Re: Guys and Dolls  (6553 views)
               sarah - Monday, July 7, 2003, at 7:41 a.m.
            •      Re: Guys and Dolls  (6448 views)    We're Here
                 Andy - Wednesday, April 21, 2004, at 6:19 p.m.


Copyright © 1998-2018, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.