> Hey, I'm not going to try to defend myself there, because I can't.. But,
> don't tell me that it's a "Filmtracks" imitation site, because
> it's as much a "CineMusic", "ScoreReviews", or hell,
> even "IGN", or perhaps any video game site in general. I'm no
> master of HTML, that's for sure, but I *do* believe that the number of
> quality score sites is MUCH to low, so I can only believe one more can't
> hurt, even if it isn't completely original. But, then again, I'm trying to
> do some little things such as the "other reviews" on every
> review showing all the other sites reviews (sometimes it's up to 7) to
> make it "slightly" different. This is somewhat useful in my
> opinion, because many of the score sites out there are unknown to people.
> Anyway my 2 cents, hope that clears things up a little.

I don't think anyone is reading this tree anymore, but I don't care. This guy, Jason, is right about the score. I only purchased it now because it's the first time I saw available anywhere (which was in Switzerland), the amount of film music CDs they have in the stores in here (Finland) is very low. When it comes to that, this place is the outback of the world. Anyways, the score for Everlasting Piece is not bad, not bad at all. Crhis doesn't explain well enough why he didn't like it. And I don't get what this one dude is trying to say with "another filmtracks copy". Hey you, wuold you say that anybody who says he'll be back in a couple of weeks, when his vacation ends, is a Schwarzenegger-wanna-be? You kind of remind me of one guy I know, he claimed that people couldn't say "So (what?)" because his American cousin had used it before us. And Jason's site is very good. I can't help myself returning there every now and then.
If any of the two people or so who accidently read this tree cared, I'dd give the score 3 1/2 stars. Hopefully you will someday be reading my reviewsite.