SUPPORT FILMTRACKS! CLICK HERE FIRST:
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
iTunes (U.S.)
Amazon.ca
Amazon.fr
eBay (U.S.)
Amazon.de
Amazon.es
Half.com
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. Transformers: Last Knight
    2. Cars 3
   3. The Mummy
  4. Wonder Woman
 5. POTC: Dead Men Tell No Tales
6. Alien: Covenant


   CURRENT BEST-SELLING SCORES:
       1. Rogue One: A Star Wars Story
      2. Fantastic Beasts/Find Them
     3. Willow
    4. The Ghost and the Darkness
   5. An American Tail
  6. The Wind and the Lion
 7. Doctor Strange
8. 10 Cloverfield Lane
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. Star Wars: Force Awakens
        2. E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial
       3. Titanic
      4. Avatar
     5. Nineteen Eighty-Four
    6. Gladiator
   7. Star Wars: A New Hope
  8. Animal Farm
 9. LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring
10. Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (Howard Shore)
Bloated, pointless review

Ryan Davis
(pool-173-49-139-193.phlapa.fios.v
erizon.net)


  Responses to this Comment:
anthony
Sarah
Harry P
Bloated, pointless review   Saturday, February 16, 2013 (8:18 p.m.) 
• Now Playing: pointless  

Clemmensen is no longer relevant. He needs to let someone else have the filmtracks.com domain so they can do something useful with it, not just ramble on for thousands and thousand of words of pointless self-indulgence in these so-called "Reviews".

However: I would like to mount Clemmensen's wife - at least he did something right.



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


anthony
(66-87-120-161.pools.spcsdns.net)

  In Response to:
Ryan Davis

  Responses to this Comment:
Paul
Re: Bloated, pointless review   Sunday, February 17, 2013 (7:51 a.m.) 

> Clemmensen is no longer relevant. He needs to let someone else have the
> filmtracks.com domain so they can do something useful with it, not just
> ramble on for thousands and thousand of words of pointless self-indulgence
> in these so-called "Reviews".

> However: I would like to mount Clemmensen's wife - at least he did
> something right.

where are pics of the wife?


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Paul
(adsl-69-106-235-62.dsl.pltn13.pac
bell.net)

  In Response to:
anthony

  Responses to this Comment:
Saffon
Re: Bloated, pointless review   Sunday, February 17, 2013 (7:16 p.m.) 

> where are pics of the wife?

http://www.filmtracks.com/news/updates.cgi?read=33



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Saffon
(70-32-205-7.unassigned.ntelos.net)

  In Response to:
Paul
Re: Bloated, pointless review   Monday, February 25, 2013 (8:30 p.m.) 

> http://www.filmtracks.com/news/updates.cgi?read=33

too skinny, not enough boob


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Sarah
(cpe-24-95-48-58.columbus.res.rr.c
om)
Profile Picture
  In Response to:
Ryan Davis
Re: Bloated, pointless review   Sunday, February 17, 2013 (8:02 a.m.) 

> Clemmensen is no longer relevant. He needs to let someone else have the
> filmtracks.com domain so they can do something useful with it, not just
> ramble on for thousands and thousand of words of pointless self-indulgence
> in these so-called "Reviews".

> However: I would like to mount Clemmensen's wife - at least he did
> something right.

Stop thinking with your COCK and appreciate what you get for free, which in your sorry-ass case means Mr. Clemmensen's reviews and not a moistened twat.


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Harry P
<Send E-Mail>
(c-68-36-122-98.hsd1.nj.comcast.ne
t)

  In Response to:
Ryan Davis
Re: Bloated, pointless review   Sunday, February 17, 2013 (7:11 p.m.) 

> Clemmensen is no longer relevant. He needs to let someone else have the
> filmtracks.com domain so they can do something useful with it, not just
> ramble on for thousands and thousand of words of pointless self-indulgence
> in these so-called "Reviews".

> However: I would like to mount Clemmensen's wife - at least he did
> something right.

Another mention of the wife, fantastic! I'm sure he'll love that remark

A review cannot be a review unless it is in depth and completely detailed to as much extent as the person can write. Some reviews are shorter, yes, but that either goes to show how horrible a score is to bother with words, or it is so impressive it is worth checking out yourself for the experience. The guy over at soundtrack geek, however, is someone you would call irrelevant. He bashed on inception, now he's a fanboy. You're not a true reviewer if you make a statement, only to change it a few months later. Clemmensen at least does not do this, at least I'm sure not very often, if at all. I haven't read all his reviews, so I can be proven wrong here. But the point of the matter is at least we know he is a mature adult male, whereas soundtrack geek, the guy screams out 'mid twenties and an amateur'. Have you got nothing better to do with your life? Apparently not. It's ok, I don't either, but at least I don't bash people unless I state a specific and logical reason for doing so. You just slumped down low, especially after your concluding statement. Give up the internet, it's not really your thing.


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display



Copyright © 1998-2017, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.