Legends of the Fall
at Amazon.com: $3.75
 
• This Week's Most Popular Reviews:
   1. Schindler's List
   2. Gladiator
   3. Star Wars: A New Hope
   4. Finding Neverland
   5. Edward Scissorhands
   6. Moulin Rouge
   7. The Hunt for Red October
   8. Legends of the Fall
   9. Batman
   10. Titanic
• Newest Major Reviews: • Best-Selling Albums:
   1. Astro Boy
   2. The Vampire's Assistant
   3. The Final Destination
   4. G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra
   5. The Time Traveler's Wife
    1. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
   2. Varèse Sarabande 30th Ann.
   3. Schindler's List
   4. Transformers: Revenge/Fallen
   5. Angels in America
 
Section Header
Advanced Search
About the Site
Contact Us
 
 
• Post Response
• View Responses
• Edit Post
• Return to Comments
• Read Previous Comment
• Read Next Comment
• Expand Entire Thread

Password: 

 
 
    Promo Scores on eBay:
 • Comments about: Il Postino (Luis Bacalov)
 • Posted by: nyze aziz <Send E-Mail>
• Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 6:27 a.m.
• IP Address: 219.92.36.173
• In Response to: Can't believe it beat Horner's Braveheart. (Ethan Edwards)

  No! It's not.


i dont think its gave a disgrace to academy coz i think its a excellent score.

i didnt say that braveheart score not good, i just wanna say that its a tough competition between il postino, braveheart,, and apollo 13.

this is b'coz, i've heard all of the nominees for best original score for that year.

il postino n braveheart are among two perfect n excellent scores.

a/way, im quite confused coz how crouchin tiger hidden dragon won the oscar even gladiator score is far more better than it.hmmmmmm




 Comments in this Thread:   ( Expand )


  • • Can't believe it beat Horner's Braveheart. (views: 1882)
       Ethan Edwards -- Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 4:56 p.m.
    •      No! It's not. (views: 1950)     We're here
         nyze aziz -- Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 6:27 a.m.
      •    Re: No! It's not. (views: 1450)
           Sherlock -- Saturday, July 29, 2006, at 12:30 a.m.
        •    Re: No! It's not. (views: 728)
             Robye -- Sunday, January 27, 2008, at 7:58 p.m.
          •    Re: No! It's not. (views: 377)
               Hannah -- Friday, January 23, 2009, at 6:46 p.m.
  Reviews by Title/Year | Viewer Ratings | Scoreboard Forum | Composer Tributes | Filmtracks Awards | Archives | Advanced Search | About the Site | Contact Us
 
  The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Filmtracks Publications. Filmtracks comment areas created 7/31/00, most recently updated 8/11/06. Version 2.0. Copyright © 1998-2009, Christian Clemmensen (Filmtracks Publications). All rights reserved.