Support Filmtracks! Click here first:
iTunes (U.S.)
eBay (U.S.)
This Week's Most Popular Reviews:
   1. Romeo & Juliet
   2. Hobbit: Unexpected Journey
   3. The Phantom of the Opera
   4. Lady in the Water
   5. Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
   6. Moulin Rouge
   7. Gladiator
   8. Titanic
   9. LOTR: Fellowship of the Ring
   10. Thor: The Dark World
Newest Major Reviews: Best-Selling Albums:
   1. Chappie
   2. Fifty Shades of Grey
   3. Night/Museum: Secret/Tomb
   4. The Imitation Game
   5. Hobbit: Battle of Five Armies
   1. Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug
   2. City of Ember
   3. Jack the Giant Slayer
   4. Indiana Jones Collection
   5. King Kong Lives
Section Header
Post Response
View Responses
Edit Post
Return to Comments
Read Previous Comment
Read Next Comment
Expand Entire Thread


  Comments about: Il Postino (Luis Bacalov)
 • Posted by: Sherlock <Send E-Mail>
• Date: Saturday, July 29, 2006, at 12:30 a.m.
• IP Address:
• In Response to: No! It's not. (nyze aziz)

  Re: No! It's not.

> i dont think its gave a disgrace to academy coz i think its a excellent
> score.

> i didnt say that braveheart score not good, i just wanna say that its a
> tough competition between il postino, braveheart,, and apollo 13.

> this is b'coz, i've heard all of the nominees for best original score for
> that year.

> il postino n braveheart are among two perfect n excellent scores.

> a/way, im quite confused coz how crouchin tiger hidden dragon won the
> oscar even gladiator score is far more better than it.hmmmmmm

I totally agree with your comment about Gladiator. I also feel the same way about oscar 2006. To me, Pride & Prejudice is a LOT better than Brokeback Mountain.

 Comments in this Thread:   ( Expand )

  • Can't believe it beat Horner's Braveheart. (views: 3548)
       Ethan Edwards -- Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 4:56 p.m.
    •    No! It's not. (views: 3641)
         nyze aziz -- Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 6:27 a.m.
      •      Re: No! It's not. (views: 3005)     We're here
           Sherlock -- Saturday, July 29, 2006, at 12:30 a.m.
        •    Re: No! It's not. (views: 2298)
             Robye -- Sunday, January 27, 2008, at 7:58 p.m.
          •    Re: No! It's not. (views: 2003)
               Hannah -- Friday, January 23, 2009, at 6:46 p.m.

  The reviews and other textual content contained on the site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Filmtracks Publications. Filmtracks comment areas created 7/31/00, most recently updated 8/11/06. Version 2.0. Copyright © 1998-2013, Christian Clemmensen (Filmtracks Publications). All rights reserved.