SUPPORT FILMTRACKS! CLICK HERE FIRST:
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
iTunes (U.S.)
Amazon.ca
Amazon.fr
eBay (U.S.)
Amazon.de
Amazon.es
Half.com
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. Venom
    2. House With a Clock/Walls
   3. The Nun
  4. Crazy Rich Asians
 5. The Meg
6. Christopher Robin
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. Edward Scissorhands
        2. Jurassic World: Kingdom
       3. Batman
      4. The Predator
     5. Gladiator
    6. Mission: Impossible - Fallout
   7. Solo: A Star Wars Story
  8. Apollo 13
 9. Ant-Man and the Wasp
10. The Equalizer 2
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for Inception (Hans Zimmer)

Edit | Delete
Re: Amazing arrogance...
• Posted by: Marc Lawson   <Send E-Mail>
• Date: Friday, June 24, 2011, at 9:48 a.m.
• IP Address: adsl-074-184-211-174.sip.asm.bellsouth.net
• In Response to: Re: Amazing arrogance... (untitled)
• Now Playing: John Powell - How To Train Your Dragon

> 1. Because Hans Zimmer "puts out dozens of projects a year" does
> not mean we should pity him or treat him (or his music) any differently.
> He does accomplish a lot in a year, but that is his job as a composer for
> film. To applaud composers for writing music is to attend a play and
> thereafter compliment the actors on how well they memorize their lines.

> 2. The music of Inception is boring, it is repetitive to the point where I
> lose interest, and it is downright lazy compared to his earlier works,
> what we all know he is capable of. It was moody, but not sentimental. Not
> honest.

> 3. I take offense to calling music critics "arrogant". We are
> needed and our work is always going to be of value. Art without critics is
> life without consequence. No one would learn and no one would improve. The
> composers as well as the listeners.

You are missing the point. I took issue with the fact that reviewer was judgmental of the composer's motivations and work ethic, not the comments about the music itself.

It takes alot of arrogance to think you know what other people are thinking and why they do what they do.

To your point #3, I think it is absurd to think that any reviewer or critic has ever been responsible for keeping music honest or helping "elevate the craft". The public's opinion (and one's own personal integrity) is enough to keep you honest. And, if a third-party opinion is really needed, anyone worth their salt generally has enough people around them to ask for feedback when they need it.

All a critic can offer is an opinion. The more informed the critic, the more valuable the opinion. That means that the best critics would be other film composers. Fortunately, most of them are too busy creating work of their own (or are too classy) to tear down the work of others.

Leave that to the buzzing gnats on the websites.




Comments in this Thread:     Expand >>
  • Amazing arrogance...  (3131 views)
       Marc Lawson - Tuesday, May 10, 2011, at 8:54 a.m.
    •    Re: Amazing arrogance...  (2859 views)
         untitled - Wednesday, May 11, 2011, at 5:41 p.m.
      •      Re: Amazing arrogance...  (2577 views)    We're Here
           Marc Lawson - Friday, June 24, 2011, at 9:48 a.m.


Copyright © 1998-2018, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.