SUPPORT FILMTRACKS! CLICK HERE FIRST:
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
iTunes (U.S.)
Amazon.ca
Amazon.fr
eBay (U.S.)
Amazon.de
Amazon.es
Half.com
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. Venom
    2. House With a Clock/Walls
   3. The Nun
  4. Crazy Rich Asians
 5. The Meg
6. Christopher Robin
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. Edward Scissorhands
        2. Jurassic World: Kingdom
       3. Batman
      4. The Predator
     5. Gladiator
    6. Mission: Impossible - Fallout
   7. Solo: A Star Wars Story
  8. Apollo 13
 9. Ant-Man and the Wasp
10. The Equalizer 2
Home Page
Menu Options ▼

Edit | Delete
Orchestrations very thin?
• Posted by: DPAR   <Send E-Mail>
• Date: Saturday, November 20, 2004, at 11:10 a.m.
• IP Address: 82-35-79-100.cable.ubr02.dals.blueyonder.co.uk

Was just wondering whether anyone agreed with me on this one, as half the world seems to worship the LOTR scores. Does anyone think the orchestrations are just too thin? It's an effect Shore used to great effect in his Silence of the Lambs score, but it just seems totally inappropriate to the LOTR films. Jackson didn't direct them as emotional dramas, IMHO, but rather as straight action flicks (the films, again IMHO, while entertaining, have about as much emotional thickness as a piece of paper). Given that direction for the film as a whole, shouldn't the music have been much "bigger" (by that I mean more orchestrally rich and varied)?

I suppose it doesn't help that I think the themes - and everything about the three scores, actually - are weak, unmemorable, and workaday, either....






Copyright © 1998-2018, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.