> > This along with the major factual errors in this review reduce it to a joke.

> [note to all: As many of you know, when you go to post comments at
> Filmtracks, it says in bold letters "Review corrections should be
> sent to Filmtracks by e-mail!" ...Ford, of course, didn't read the
> instructions. I e-mailed him and requested that he detail the 'major
> factual errors' in the review and he has been unwilling or unable to
> respond. Thus, I've turned the review over to Intrada and will get the
> verdict directly from them. In the meantime, I'd suggest disregarding
> Ford's rants as emotional reactions rather than constructive criticism.
> What else is new....]

Straight from the source, I confirmed that there were no "major factual errors" in the Lost in Space review. I had forgotten about Mark Isham's involvement in the project in between Goldsmith and Broughton, so I inserted him in the intro information. Other than that omission, the review is fine. Thaxton obviously disagrees with the opinion to such an extent that he claims it a "joke" due to "major factual errors."

I challenged him on it, and he has chosen to be silent. That says quite a lot to me.

Thaxton: let your logic do the typing next time, not your emotions.

Christian