> First of all, calm down. You'll have a stroke.

> Secondly, perhaps I generalised a bit but my issue still remains the same.
> From the extensive list below, only five of the soundtracks have been
> released in the last ten years and we all know Zimmer pumps out more than
> his fair share every year.

> CK has obviously liked some older scores by Zimmer as demonstrated by your
> list, but steadily over the years the reviews have gotten progressivly
> worse (even though I would argue Zimmer's work has gotten better) and the
> other point of my post was that CK no longer cares on the effectivness of
> a score within a film. I kind of thought the main point of writing a film
> score was to enhance the film and surely this should be the focus of
> reviews on a site dedicated to Film Soundtracks.

> Now I'd tell you to [bleep!] off too, but that would be rude.

Who is CK? He's called Clemensen, not Kühn

If his reviews are becoming similar, ever thought about the possibility that Zimmer has settled into an unimaginative routine as well? And he has!
Clemensen cares very much about the effectiveness in the film, that's why it's SO painful to hear always the same routine in vastly different movies.

The more fame Zimmer gathered, the lazier he has become.
When you listen to film scores or/and watch movies on a regular basis, how can you accept this immovable, ever- returning style as effective anymore?

It has reached a point where it actively hurts films.