SUPPORT FILMTRACKS! CLICK HERE FIRST:
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
iTunes (U.S.)
Amazon.ca
Amazon.fr
eBay (U.S.)
Amazon.de
Amazon.es
Half.com
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. Shazam!
    2. Dumbo
   3. Captain Marvel
  4. HTTYD: The Hidden World
 5. The Lego Movie 2
6. Aquaman
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. Batman
        2. Star Wars: The Last Jedi
       3. Apollo 13
      4. Edward Scissorhands
     5. How to Train Your Dragon
    6. Jurassic World: Kingdom
   7. First Man
  8. Solo: A Star Wars Story
 9. Justice League
10. Ready Player One
Home Page
Menu Options ▼

Edit | Delete
Isn't four stars considered good?
• Posted by: Lynn M
• Date: Thursday, May 27, 2004, at 8:54 a.m.
• IP Address: h000bdb1264cc.ne.client2.attbi.com
• In Response to: Another bad Harry Potter review. (Doug)

> I think this guy has something against Harry Potter. No matter what the
> case he has something to argue against Harry Potter. In the first it was
> "it lacked magic", in the second "it didn't have any good
> soaring themes". So now Williams supplies an enormous amount of new
> music and Clem still isn't satisfied. I agree that we need a new reviewer.
> And I thought Clem wanted more original music, but when he gets it, he
> doesn't like it. Don't get me wrong, he gave it a ****, which is really
> good, but I still think it really really deserved an extra *.

Why is everyone who loves Harry Potter calling for the editor to be fired when he gave all three Potter scores **** (positive reviews!)?




Comments in this Thread:     Expand >>


Copyright © 1998-2019, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.