SUPPORT FILMTRACKS! CLICK HERE FIRST:
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
iTunes (U.S.)
Amazon.ca
Amazon.fr
eBay (U.S.)
Amazon.de
Amazon.es
Half.com
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. Halloween
    2. Venom
   3. House With a Clock/Walls
  4. The Nun
 5. Crazy Rich Asians
6. The Meg
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. Solo: A Star Wars Story
        2. Batman
       3. Jurassic World: Kingdom
      4. The Predator
     5. Edward Scissorhands
    6. Mission: Impossible - Fallout
   7. Christopher Robin
  8. Apollo 13
 9. Ant-Man and the Wasp
10. The Equalizer 2
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
We need a new main reviewer at Filmtracks.com

Walker
(id-mthome-cmts2b-55.losaca.adelph
ia.net)


  Responses to this Comment:
sandstone warrior
Chris
Christian Kühn
Lynn M
Peter
Tomek
We need a new main reviewer at Filmtracks.com   Thursday, May 27, 2004 (7:38 a.m.) 

How can Clemmensen be so stupid that he called the 'window to the past' theme the primary one for the movie?? Any moron can hear that 'double trouble' is the main theme. Can't somebody hold Clemmensen responsible for these ridiculous dumb reviews???

Force Clemmensen to review only crappy Ford A Thaxton albums and leave modern classics to more experienced reviewers!!



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


sandstone warrior
(203.76.254.54)

  In Response to:
Walker

  Responses to this Comment:
Christian Kühn
Re: We need a new main reviewer at Filmtracks.com   Thursday, May 27, 2004 (7:52 a.m.) 

> How can Clemmensen be so stupid that he called the 'window to the past'
> theme the primary one for the movie?? Any moron can hear that 'double
> trouble' is the main theme. Can't somebody hold Clemmensen responsible for
> these ridiculous dumb reviews???

someone should go out to montana and threaten to crank clemmenson's wife up the ass if he doesn't shape up and get his reviews right. . . i think everyone that reads this filmtracks.com site is fed up with the ignorance of the editor

> Force Clemmensen to review only crappy Ford A Thaxton albums and leave
> modern classics to more experienced reviewers!!

amen, brother.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Christian Kühn
(geo07.geologie.uni-freiburg.de)
Profile Picture
  In Response to:
sandstone warrior

  Responses to this Comment:
Joe
Re: We need a new main reviewer at Filmtracks.com   Thursday, May 27, 2004 (8:04 a.m.) 

> someone should go out to montana and threaten to crank clemmenson's wife
> up the ass if he doesn't shape up and get his reviews right...

How about if you get cranked up the ass, eh? Maybe that would help you to get your narrow-mindedness under control.

> i think everyone that reads this filmtracks.com site is fed up with the
> ignorance of the editor

You think wrong.



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Joe
<Send E-Mail>
(pcp453746pcs.gillst01.ar.comcast.
net)

  In Response to:
Christian Kühn

  Responses to this Comment:
Tomek
Re: We need a new main reviewer at Filmtracks.com   Sunday, May 30, 2004 (8:10 p.m.) 

> How about if you get cranked up the ass, eh? Maybe that would help you
> to get your narrow-mindedness under control.

> You think wrong.

I think reading these posts, that it is you who is wrong,
and talk about getting cranked up the ass, I think you are up Clemmenson's ass, as you seem to defend him like a lap dog would.


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Tomek
<Send E-Mail>
(pb138.glucholazy.sdi.tpnet.pl)

  In Response to:
Joe
Re: We need a new main reviewer at Filmtracks.com   Wednesday, August 4, 2004 (12:31 a.m.) 

> I think reading these posts, that it is you who is wrong,
and talk
> about getting cranked up the ass, I think you are up Clemmenson's ass, as
> you seem to defend him like a lap dog would.

Good said Joe! The guy who defends Clemmensen is pathetic, always was...


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Chris
<Send E-Mail>
(ale-mans-201-1-1-38.w193-251.abo.
wanadoo.fr)

  In Response to:
Walker
Re: We need a new main reviewer at Filmtracks.com   Thursday, May 27, 2004 (7:57 a.m.) 

> How can Clemmensen be so stupid that he called the 'window to the past'
> theme the primary one for the movie?? Any moron can hear that 'double
> trouble' is the main theme. Can't somebody hold Clemmensen responsible for
> these ridiculous dumb reviews???

> Force Clemmensen to review only crappy Ford A Thaxton albums and leave
> modern classics to more experienced reviewers!!

Hi,
I think you should be more tolerant; to love or to hate a score is highly subjective...
I think "Azkaban" score is darker than the others, but less interesting too... "Double trouble" is maybe the main theme for you, but I am not convinced at all (I don't see main theme except the always same first track showing you that you're listening to a Harry Potter score).
This is a very good score, but not the score of the year... ****
Bye.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Christian Kühn
(geo07.geologie.uni-freiburg.de)
Profile Picture
  In Response to:
Walker
Re: We need a new main reviewer at Filmtracks.com   Thursday, May 27, 2004 (7:57 a.m.) 

> How can Clemmensen be so stupid that he called the 'window to the past'
> theme the primary one for the movie?? Any moron can hear that 'double
> trouble' is the main theme.

You realize that you just called yourself a moron?

> Can't somebody hold Clemmensen responsible for these ridiculous dumb
> reviews???

For the 1000th time...if you are so angered by Clem's reviews that you loose all joy to live, then for God's sake, write an alternate review. Is that so difficult?

> Force Clemmensen to review only crappy Ford A Thaxton albums and leave
> modern classics to more experienced reviewers!!

Like? (you can use it for three items in your sentence)

CK

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Lynn M
(h000bdb1264cc.ne.client2.attbi.co
m)

  In Response to:
Walker
Re: We need a new main reviewer at Filmtracks.com   Thursday, May 27, 2004 (8:55 a.m.) 

> How can Clemmensen be so stupid that he called the 'window to the past'
> theme the primary one for the movie?? Any moron can hear that 'double
> trouble' is the main theme. Can't somebody hold Clemmensen responsible for
> these ridiculous dumb reviews???

> Force Clemmensen to review only crappy Ford A Thaxton albums and leave
> modern classics to more experienced reviewers!!

I don't know why he keeps running this site when its readers are such unappreciative dorks.



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Peter
<Send E-Mail>
(82-38-175-137.cable.ubr01.shef.bl
ueyonder.co.uk)
Profile Picture
  In Response to:
Walker

  Responses to this Comment:
Mark
Re: Your dumb.   Thursday, May 27, 2004 (4:37 p.m.) 

> Any moron can hear that 'double
> trouble' is the main theme.

No it isn't. Have you even HEARD the CD?

PT.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Mark
<Send E-Mail>
(24-181-198-098.dhcp.hckr.nc.chart
er.com)

  In Response to:
Peter
Re: Your dumb.   Saturday, March 11, 2006 (12:12 p.m.) 

> No it isn't. Have you even HEARD the CD?
> PT.

I think you're both dumb. I agree with the reviewer that the main theme is "Window to the Past."

P.S. Learn some grammar.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Tomek
<Send E-Mail>
(pa181.glucholazy.sdi.tpnet.pl)

  In Response to:
Walker
Re:I can be new reviewer! Guys, grow up finally... *NM*   Friday, May 28, 2004 (12:48 a.m.) 



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display



Copyright © 1998-2018, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.