SUPPORT FILMTRACKS! CLICK HERE FIRST:
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
iTunes (U.S.)
Amazon.ca
Amazon.fr
eBay (U.S.)
Amazon.de
Amazon.es
Half.com
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. Incredibles 2
    2. Solo: A Star Wars Story
   3. Deadpool 2
  4. Avengers: Infinity War
 5. A Quiet Place
6. Ready Player One
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. Star Wars: The Last Jedi
        2. Gladiator
       3. Blade Runner 2049
      4. Batman
     5. Thor: Ragnarok
    6. The Avengers
   7. Spider-Man: Homecoming
  8. Avatar
 9. Dunkirk
10. Phantom Thread
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for Radio (James Horner)

Edit | Delete
Re: Radio
Profile Image
• Posted by: Amuro
• Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 6:04 p.m.
• IP Address: 12-222-16-223.client.insightbb.com
• In Response to: Re: Radio (Mike Skerritt)

> Let's say you write for a magazine. At the core you're a good writer. You
> have a way with words. Maybe early on in your career you wrote an
> inventive and brilliant article on a large family of wolves (or whatever,
> it doesn't matter). Basically this article gave you a career at the
> magazine. Although you're still writing for the magazine, you can write
> whatever you want. But you choose to write about the same wolves. For
> every story. You can only stretch the story so many ways. At some point
> you'll end up describing the same things using the same words. Your
> articles will most likely become repetitive and boring. When you've tapped
> at a family of wolves, you'll move on to a family of coyotes. Or hyenas.
> Or leopards. It doesn't much matter. You'll probably have a lot of readers
> who criticize you for any number of reasons (selling out, being overrated,
> writing crap, etc.) From an objective standpoint, you wouldn't be a very
> good writer. At least not a very original one.

> As a reader, why should I waste my time with a writer who's constantly
> spilling out the same exact story again and again? I'd rather go off and
> read someone who, even if he always writes with a similar style, always
> finds something fresh to write about, something I haven't read before.

> As a former Horner-phile, his output frustrates the hell out of me. I
> don't think I'm asking too much for someone who was once so promising and
> creative to challenge himself. Maybe reinvent himself. He's 50 now. It
> doesn't look like that will ever happen.

> Slainte,
M

Ah, it all seems to make a hell of a lot more sense now, thanks. I am a huge fan of Horner, and to be quite honest, I find more repetetive nature in the scores of Williams (E.X. the spider theme from Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, and the Raptor theme from Jurassic Park). But I recently did buy "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan" and I can notice many of the Horner themes sticking out. Well, thank you

Amuro (who learns more and more, thanks to people like you )




Comments in this Thread:     Expand >>
  • Radio  (5220 views)
       Amuro - Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 2:36 p.m.
    •    Re: Radio  (4853 views)
         Mike Skerritt - Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 8:04 a.m.
      •      Re: Radio  (4936 views)    We're Here
           Amuro - Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 6:04 p.m.
        •    Re: Radio  (5447 views)
             Mike Skerritt - Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 6:41 a.m.
          •    Re: Radio  (5052 views)
               Amuro - Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 2:26 p.m.
            •    Re: Radio  (5074 views)
                 Mike Skerritt - Monday, November 24, 2003, at 1:49 p.m.


Copyright © 1998-2018, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.