![]() |
|
| ||||||||||
| | Newest Major Reviews: | . | | This Week's Most Popular Reviews: | | Best-Selling Albums: | ||
| . |
1. The Dark Knight 2. WALL·E 3. Kung Fu Panda 4. The Incredible Hulk 5. Indiana Jones: Kingdom of the Crystal Skull | . | . |
1. Moulin Rouge 2. Gladiator 3. POTC: Curse of the Black Pearl 4. Star Wars: A New Hope 5. Edward Scissorhands |
6. Pearl Harbor 7. Schindler's List 8. Titanic 9. Braveheart 10. Home Alone | . | . |
1. Varèse Sarabande 25th 2. The Last of the Mohicans 3. Legends of the Fall 4. Schindler's List 5. LOTR: Return of the King (Set) |
|
|
![]()
Filmtracks Recommends: Buy it... if you lean towards the 1990 Ennio Morricone way of thinking when it comes to modern sounds of Hamlet. Avoid it... if you lean towards the 1996 Patrick Doyle method of scoring the classic tale with a robust symphony orchestra. Filmtracks Editorial Review:
Whether you enjoy or accept the minimalistic result from Burwell depends on how you believe your Shakespearean films should sound. Traditional film score fans are fond of Doyle's 1996 Hamlet and fans of post-modern scores often gravitate towards Ennio Morricone's score for the 1990 Mel Gibson version. Burwell definitely leans towards Morricone's approach, allowing the story to speak for itself and leaving the pomp and outward drama completely out of the equation. This decision could probably have been expected, given Burwell's tendency to produce brooding, off-center music. Unfortunately, Burwell strays too far from the emotional heart of the classic story, allowing his music to be the victim of its own mediocre size. The shallow score plays as though it was written with constraint in mind, rather than attempting to make the most emotion possible out of the small performing group. If anything, Doyle's Great Expectations proved that you can insert modern rhythms, vocals, and traditional elements into a blend worthy of a classic tale. What Burwell wrote for Hamlet is repetitively monotonous, simplistic, and devoid of emotion. Moments meant to convey extreme action lack punch and vary very little from the mass of uninteresting, rumbling underscore. Burwell does succeed in moments of troubled contemplation, though, with a cello performing an alternating, churning motif that extends throughout the score. But some of his use of what seems like a string quartet is a bit cliche, with the slow chopping of a bass string attempting to carry the duel scene. When the ensemble is put together in all of its force, such as in the opening and final cues, the score begins to exhibit the kind of attitude that could have guided this score to success with more creative instrumentation. In this case, Burwell's loyalty to "traditional" instruments breaks the back of this Hamlet. It leaves you wondering if your stereo was ever on while you were listening to it, tumbling along in the deep regions where it's hard to notice and hard to care. **
Insert includes a note from the director about Burwell and the score. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|