|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Go back and read my January 2003 announcement about review format... ...on the Scoreboard. There are reasons the reviews are the way they are. All the regular readers were given reasons for the current format in advance. If the format puts your ass in a knot, then that's too bad, because this current review format has been the most successful for the widest variety of readers since the site began.
If you don't like the 150 words of background in a 800 word review, then you'd be horrified by the print standard for soundtrack reviews. Have you ever read Scorehound reviews, for instance? Half of their review is background (or film) related. Filmtracks is written for same audience. Not just the die-hard score nuts, but the mainstream moviegoer who owns three soundtracks and is considering buying a fourth.
End of story. My wife refers to people like you as "unappreciative little shits."
Christian
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- Another over-long, pseudo description of the film in the review... (5556 views)
Tomek - Tuesday, September 7, 2004, at 12:26 a.m.
-
Go back and read my January 2003 announcement about review format... (5387 views)
Christian Clemmensen - Tuesday, September 7, 2004, at 7:09 a.m.
- Yup. Ain't it great? (5197 views)
Morlock - Tuesday, September 7, 2004, at 5:31 a.m.
|
|
|