iTunes (U.S.)
eBay (U.S.)
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
         1. Gladiator
        2. Batman
       3. Nightmare Before Christmas
      4. Titanic
     5. Justice League
    6. Star Wars: The Last Jedi
   7. Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
  8. Maleficent
 9. Star Wars: The Force Awakens
10. Edward Scissorhands
Home Page
Menu Options ▼

Edit | Delete
Re: Go back and read my January 2003 announcement about review format...
Profile Image
• Posted by: Jonathan Broxton   <Send E-Mail>
• Date: Thursday, September 9, 2004, at 3:05 a.m.
• IP Address:
• In Response to: Re: Go back and read my January 2003 announcem... (greg)

> Jon Broxton has even longer movie movie sum-ups. And don't forget the
> extra length if the movie was based on a book, event, or stirred
> controversy.

Indeed I do. I personally think a FILM music review is absolutely worthless unless it is put into some kind of the context (i.e. you have some idea of the kind of FILM it is supporting) and without a little historical information about the composer, and (if any) the events surrounding the CD release.

My standard review format (based on a 900-word average length) is 75 words introduction, 250 words about the movie, 500 words about the score, 75 words summary/conclusion. This seems completely logical to me.

Tomek's point about "leave the commentary about the movie out of the review" is completely ludicrous to me. That's like writing about an opera without mentioning the libretto, or writing about ballet without mentioning the dancing.


Comments in this Thread:     Expand >>

Copyright © 1998-2020, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.