|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Uh-oh...
|
|
Uh-oh... |
Saturday, November 21, 2009 (4:19 a.m.) |
|---|
Oh boy, I think you're going to run into some nasty negative-comment trouble for THIS review, Christian. But it is a very accurate one, in my opinion. Outside of the catchy and memorable title cue, there's no point in buying this album.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
Re: Uh-oh... |
Saturday, November 21, 2009 (12:06 p.m.) |
|---|
> Oh boy, I think you're going to run into some nasty negative-comment
> trouble for THIS review, Christian. But it is a very accurate one, in my
> opinion. Outside of the catchy and memorable title cue, there's no point
> in buying this album.
It's ok. You have to keep the context in mind. For your average score collector ** is fairly accurate, for Vangelis collectors **** is accurate. And it's indeed a fact that Vangelis scores are presented as rearranged albums rather than complete scores. Some may like that, others not. As a Vangelis-album, it's a classic, and that long 21-minute piece is *really* very good, one of the best long suites in his carreer.
I still think Blade Runner is his best score *and* one that could appeal to typical score collectors as well. Closely followed by 1492.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
|