iTunes (U.S.)
eBay (U.S.)
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
         1. Gladiator
        2. Batman
       3. Nightmare Before Christmas
      4. Titanic
     5. Justice League
    6. Star Wars: The Last Jedi
   7. Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
  8. Maleficent
 9. Star Wars: The Force Awakens
10. Edward Scissorhands
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for The Da Vinci Code (Hans Zimmer)

Edit | Delete
Re: Hans Zimmer, The Catholic Church, Ritual Sacrifice, and my general opinion
Profile Image
• Posted by: FIshBulb
• Date: Thursday, May 18, 2006, at 3:54 p.m.
• IP Address:
• In Response to: Hans Zimmer, The Catholic Church, Ritual Sacri... (Amuro)

> Yet again we are met with dissapointment! A film comes to us, which has
> the potential for a ROUSING, imaginative, and PHENOMINAL orchestral score
> of biblical proportions and who does Director RON HOWARD choose?! HANS
> ZIMMER?! Honestly, I've got to admit that this has been the worst let down
> in recent years. I try to stay away from choosing favorites and blasting
> composers, but I have a special place in my heart for Zimmer... as my
> LEAST favorite film composer.

> I expected Horner - obviously. He and Howard have worked together so many
> times, and always with a grand end result (Apollo 13 for example)... so to
> find out that Zimmer was the composer of choice was upsetting. I haven't
> heard anything Zimmer has written (and I do mean ANYTHING) that has been
> particularly memorable, interesting, or enjoyable. His instrumentation
> never varies, a ballsy brass section which is in severe underuse because
> of his damnded synthesizers which, by the way, ruin EVERYTHING. Some of
> his individual cues have been mildly enjoyable such as "The
> Battle" from Gladiatior, but I've got to say, real instrumetns would
> make it better. How about "Patricide" from that same score... I
> would say phenominal, but I recognize that almost any other composer, if
> given the same thematic motive, could have orchestrated it a lot better,
> and written far more interesting counterpoint.

> Yet another thing - Zimmer's counterpoint. At many times, almost
> non-existant... he throws the melody so far in your face that you can't
> even begin to focus on whats behind it (which in the writing of composers
> such as Stravinsky can be even MORE interesting... but more on him
> later)... and then you realize... there is NOTHING behind it. A block
> chord... if that! Furthermore, its always the SAME orchestration on top...
> blasting french horns. Don't get me wrong... I love the french horn, and
> my writing is rich with it... but what about something else? The oboe is
> pretty!

> In band class we played "This Land" from the lion king, and the
> orchestration BLEW ME AWAY. I thought "How could ZIMMER have done
> something so A) musically interesting and B) lush in its orchestration
> because obviously the band arrangement reflects the film
> arrangement." Several things then came to my mind... it was probably
> ghost written, he probably didn't orchestrate it in the first place, and
> the arranger of the Disney medley probably changed it anyway.

> I had a chat with my composition teacher about Zimmer once... and he said
> (and I agree) that Zimmer doesn't know what he's doing anymore... he's
> afraid to take chances and to be interesting. Its completely true...
> everytime a Zimmer fanboy listens to a score, I guess its like hearing
> "The Rite of Spring" for the first time or something - but
> everytime I hear something by Zimmer, its like listening to the same thing
> I heard from ZImmer last time...

> I guess someone could argue "if it aint broken... don't fix it!"
> But there lies another problem... it was broken to begin with...
> harmonically uninteresting, rhythmically dull, and emotionally sour... I
> favor James Horner over Zimmer mainly because despite his rehash, it was
> good to begin with. I'm all in favor of enjoying music because it speaks
> to your heart... this does NOT speak to my heart... but I recognize it
> might speak to others.

> But the bottomline is this:

> Zimmer fanboys... get over yourselves, you try to argue that which is not
> arguable... Zimmer does copy himself... Zimmer does excercise a knowledge
> of music theory comparable to a second grader... and most of all he does
> do it shamelessly.

> Amuro

> * the catholic church is only mentioned via "The Da Vinci Code"
> rant at the top..
** Ritual Scrifice refers to "The Rite of
> Spring"

Fair points, I agree mostly. I feel let down by the score to the Da Vinci Code - a score that should have been a lot better. I dont think, as Clemmensen put it, Godlnethal would by wise - nor Horner, for that matter. But someone other than Hans Zimmer. I like Zimmer a lot, his music is very accessible. But that's the problem with this score. It shouldn't really be - as i feel it is - this 'basic' (as film scores go). It needs more depth: more than just putting a female choir in here and there (I realise this might be leitmotif for Mary Magdelene...).

Your 'disclaimer' at the bottom was a wee bit arsey though Amuro. No offence, but why put the terms "Catholic Church" and "Ritual Sacrifice" in the subject and then debunk your own usage of those terms at the end? Attention?

Comments in this Thread:     Expand >>

Copyright © 1998-2020, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.