|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Zimmer is Lord, Clemmensen is Fool!
|
|
Zimmer is Lord, Clemmensen is Fool! |
Wednesday, May 10, 2006 (7:32 a.m.) |
|---|
Why is Clemmensen bother reviewing Zimmer scores when he knows he is going to give low marks???
They must import new reviewer to review Zimmer scores! Or cut off Clemmensen fingers so he won't type!
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
Brian Louise
(80.179.107.162.ispeednet.net)
In Response to:
↑ Warrenor
Responses to this Comment:
↓ Seth Loren |
|
Jesus is Lord, not Zimmer |
Wednesday, May 10, 2006 (8:02 a.m.) |
|---|
So not say "Zimmer is Lord" lightly. Our Saviour Jesus Christ died for your sins and showed you the path to your salvation. He is your Lord.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
Jesus is Fool, not Lord |
Wednesday, May 10, 2006 (12:33 p.m.) |
|---|
> So not say "Zimmer is Lord" lightly. Our Saviour Jesus Christ
> died for your sins and showed you the path to your salvation. He is your
> Lord.
Christ should have known that religious hustlers like you would take his ideas and turn them into a freak show for profit. Be gone!
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
Re: Jesus is Fool, not Lord |
Thursday, May 11, 2006 (6:27 a.m.) |
|---|
How about a sensible response, actually related to what the guy said, and not more meaningless religious drivel?
I hate Zimmer. You like Zimmer. Who's right? We probably both are. I have my reasons for hating him (repetition, business before art, swallowing talented composers into Remote Control, promoting generic meaningless film music, further erroding any chances we have to herald in another orchestral golden age, in which film music is complex, intelligent, grand, well written, unique, and above all, personal) -- you have your reasons for liking him.
Christian's review was exceptionally complimentary to the score and to Zimmer - it gave credit where credit was most definitely due. It also pointed out the negative aspects. If you were writing the review, it would say "Zimmer is great, this is the best thing ever!" where it quite clearly is not. Writing an intelligent, unbiased review is exceptionally difficult and requires a great deal more thought.
DF
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
Carl
(modemcable087.130-56-74.mc.videot
ron.ca)
In Response to:
↑ Warrenor |
|
Re: Zimmer is Lord, Clemmensen is Fool! |
Saturday, May 13, 2006 (8:34 a.m.) |
|---|
> Why is Clemmensen bother reviewing Zimmer scores when he knows he is going
> to give low marks???
> They must import new reviewer to review Zimmer scores! Or cut off
> Clemmensen fingers so he won't type!
I don't know if you read the review , but Clemmensen did actually enjoy this score and he gave it 4 stars...damn isn't that enought for you Fan Boy?
I am sick of you people bashing Clemmensen for no good reasons.
If i where you I would never come back here, cause Clemmensen won't become a Super mega biased Hans Zimmer fan Boy like you are.
Get a life
Carl
P.S. The Da Vinci code is a good album, really , but it is not the "holy Grail" Of Zimmer.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
Re: Zimmer is Lord, Clemmensen is Fool! |
Monday, June 12, 2006 (4:57 p.m.) |
|---|
- I totally Agree!!! Go Hansy!!!:D
> Why is Clemmensen bother reviewing Zimmer scores when he knows he is going
> to give low marks???
> They must import new reviewer to review Zimmer scores! Or cut off
> Clemmensen fingers so he won't type!
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
|
|
