SUPPORT FILMTRACKS! WE EARN A
COMMISSION ON WHAT YOU BUY:
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
eBay
Amazon.ca
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. 1917
    2. Little Women
   3. Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker
  4. Jumanji: The Next Level
 5. Knives Out
6. Frozen II


   CURRENT BEST-SELLING SCORES:
       1. Godzilla: King of the Monsters
      2. Romeo and Juliet
     3. The Monkey King
    4. John Williams in Vienna
   5. Space Battleship Yamato
  6. Willow
 7. Ready Player One
8. Ghostbusters
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. How to Train Your Dragon
        2. Nightmare Before Christmas
       3. Gladiator
      4. Alice in Wonderland
     5. Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
    6. Superman
   7. LOTR: Return of the King
  8. Titanic
 9. Raiders of the Lost Ark
10. Joker
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for Dragonslayer (Alex North)

Edit | Delete
Re: Dumbest review ever
• Posted by: Mike
• Date: Sunday, December 27, 2009, at 3:24 p.m.
• IP Address: stgt-4d033e05.pool.mediaways.net
• In Response to: Re: Dumbest review ever (Stranger)

> What? And who's been arrogant here? It would seem that only you are able
> to judge how a good score must be. Define what a "movie lover"
> is, please. What is that? Perhaps someone who likes scores by the likes of
> Horner or Goldsmith (precisely the ones you enjoy? What a coindidence...
> Well, don't make me laugh please, I'm tired of hearing opinions about
> people like you who consider their personal tastes as the yardstick to
> measure the objective quality of something.

> "Dragonslayer" is a neglected masterpiece, it's not for
> everyone, but it's sheer quality is plain to see, I think.

The "objective quality of something" ... I think with film music there is no such thing. Yes, you can measure the quality of the orchestration, the sound quality, the complexity of the score, the quality-by-atonality etc. But all that is nothing when it doesn't work in the film.

The Dragonslayer score really distracted me from the movie, it was so much in my face and out of sync with the screen action (I think about the awful finale). As I already said, a score must put itself in the service of the movie, it shouldn't be conceived like a composition that stands on its own (if it does it's great but that's only a goodie).

Horner is a good example. There are a lot of people (incl. me) that hate when he reuses the same melodies & tricks over and over again. His latest score for Avatar can be described as Best-of-Horner, many similarities to previous scores. Nevertheless I like the score very much and within the movie it works brilliantly so he must do something right and that is to reflect and support the scene with his music.




Comments in this Thread:     Expand >>
  • Absolutely correct  (4102 views)
       Mike - Monday, July 3, 2006, at 9:31 a.m.
    •    Dumbest review ever  (3865 views)
         Stranger - Friday, March 21, 2008, at 7:26 a.m.
      •    Re: Dumbest review ever  (3407 views)
           Erick Espinosa - Tuesday, June 2, 2009, at 3:27 p.m.
      •    Re: Dumbest review ever  (3683 views)
           Mike - Sunday, August 3, 2008, at 7:40 a.m.
        •    Re: Dumbest review ever  (3486 views)
             Stranger - Monday, October 13, 2008, at 12:03 p.m.
          •      Re: Dumbest review ever  (2864 views)    We're Here
               Mike - Sunday, December 27, 2009, at 3:24 p.m.


Copyright © 1998-2020, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.