|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! > It is quite good! It's long, but it doesn't feel long. It think it was
> very well done (however, some of the places where Horner adds his four
> note "evil" motif are just hilarious...such as when the German
> guy simply puts a cigarette in his mouth "duh duh duh dahhh!!!"
> )
Maybe good old James tries to tell us how bad smoking is?
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (16058 views)
Brendan Anderson - Saturday, March 17, 2001, at 5:51 a.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15502 views)
Ryan - Tuesday, March 20, 2001, at 7:16 p.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15641 views)
Jonathan Broxton - Tuesday, March 20, 2001, at 9:20 a.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15540 views)
blade runner - Monday, March 19, 2001, at 10:25 a.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15758 views)
Tim Perrine - Monday, March 19, 2001, at 8:07 a.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15409 views)
Bill Harnsberger - Saturday, March 17, 2001, at 7:09 a.m.
|
|
|
|