|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Hmmm.... > Now that's just the most ridiculous, straw grasping defense I've heard yet
> for this score. For crying out loud!
Would you care to expand on that or would you just like to spend some more quality time insulting my argument some more? 
-Brendan
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- • Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15976 views)
Brendan Anderson - Saturday, March 17, 2001, at 5:51 a.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15424 views)
Ryan - Tuesday, March 20, 2001, at 7:16 p.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15563 views)
Jonathan Broxton - Tuesday, March 20, 2001, at 9:20 a.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15462 views)
blade runner - Monday, March 19, 2001, at 10:25 a.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15403 views)
Pepito - Saturday, March 24, 2001, at 7:21 a.m.
-
Re: Hmmm.... (15262 views)
Brendan Anderson - Monday, March 19, 2001, at 1:00 p.m.
- Re: Hmmm.... (15218 views)
Chris Tilton - Thursday, March 22, 2001, at 6:55 a.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15678 views)
Tim Perrine - Monday, March 19, 2001, at 8:07 a.m.
- Re: Schindler's? No. History? Yes! (15331 views)
Bill Harnsberger - Saturday, March 17, 2001, at 7:09 a.m.
|
|
|
|
