Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
     1. Artemis Fowl
    2. Da 5 Bloods
   3. Scoob!
  4. Extraction
 5. The Willoughbys
6. Spenser Confidential

       1. Godzilla: King of the Monsters
      2. Romeo and Juliet
     3. The Monkey King
    4. John Williams in Vienna
   5. Space Battleship Yamato
  6. Willow
 7. Ready Player One
8. Ghostbusters
         1. How to Train Your Dragon
        2. Nightmare Before Christmas
       3. Gladiator
      4. Alice in Wonderland
     5. Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
    6. Superman
   7. LOTR: Return of the King
  8. Titanic
 9. Raiders of the Lost Ark
10. Joker
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for Gods and Generals (Frizzell/Edelman)

Edit | Delete
Re: Gettysburg was better
• Posted by: Nate Jackson   <Send E-Mail>
• Date: Friday, April 18, 2003, at 8:31 a.m.
• IP Address:
• In Response to: Re: Gettysburg was better (Ashi-taka469)

> Although Gettysburg was appealing in its more limited and smaller style,
> Edelman simply relied too heavily on synthesizers in a score that really
> needed more real instrumentation. That mistake is corrected with the help
> of John Frizzel in Gods and Generals, which really is a unique one in of
> itself for a historic film score. Most scores for war and history films
> tend to become too repetitive with only minimal shifts in emotional
> content and tone. G&G was not like that. A close friend of mine, a music
> major, was most impressed with the effective and quite frequent shifts in
> tone present in G&G.

Gettysburg was a better soundtrack. It has been said that the music in that film did not fit the scenes properly. They got me in the mood in whatever was going on. Isnt that what good music is supposed to do? Finally, we cant blame Randy for the fake strings, although alot of the instruments were real, due to lack of funding, they couldnt afford the full orchestra.

Comments in this Thread:     Expand >>
  • Gettysburg was better  (5207 views)
       Philip Zamora - Friday, March 21, 2003, at 10:51 a.m.
    •    Re: Gettysburg was better  (5258 views)
         Ashi-taka469 - Thursday, April 17, 2003, at 11:32 a.m.
      •      Re: Gettysburg was better  (5052 views)    We're Here
           Nate Jackson - Friday, April 18, 2003, at 8:31 a.m.

Copyright © 1998-2021, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.