SUPPORT FILMTRACKS! WE EARN A
COMMISSION ON WHAT YOU BUY:
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
eBay
Amazon.ca
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. Da 5 Bloods
    2. Scoob!
   3. Extraction
  4. The Willoughbys
 5. Spenser Confidential
6. Onward


   CURRENT BEST-SELLING SCORES:
       1. Godzilla: King of the Monsters
      2. Romeo and Juliet
     3. The Monkey King
    4. John Williams in Vienna
   5. Space Battleship Yamato
  6. Willow
 7. Ready Player One
8. Ghostbusters
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. How to Train Your Dragon
        2. Nightmare Before Christmas
       3. Gladiator
      4. Alice in Wonderland
     5. Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
    6. Superman
   7. LOTR: Return of the King
  8. Titanic
 9. Raiders of the Lost Ark
10. Joker
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for Gods and Generals (Frizzell/Edelman)

Edit | Delete
Re: Gettysburg was better
• Posted by: Bryant Hinkle Opeil   <Send E-Mail>
• Date: Monday, May 2, 2005, at 11:04 a.m.
• IP Address: adsl-2-234-57.mia.bellsouth.net
• In Response to: Re: Gettysburg was better (Nate)

> Actually, we CAN blame Randy because, much like Vangelis, Randy has always
> relied heavily on synthesizers. I hav eyet to hear a full, or nearly full
> orchestra score by him

Yes the Gods and Generals had a bigger ochestra and was larger in scale, but the score to Gettysburg had a distinct sound to it. Gettysburg had emotional motifs in its score while it seems that Gods and Generals was all over the place. There were times while listening to the score and watching the movie when I had to roll my eyes at hearing a certain motif. It was like going throught he motions of war cliches. I was expecting a Gettysburg like score and instead got a notoriously boring score, much like the movie. Gettysburg had a better score and script and the two went together nicely. I don't understand what went wrong and why Gods and Generals gets five stars and Gettysburg only three. It should be the other way around.




Comments in this Thread:     Expand >>
  • Gettysburg was better  (5203 views)
       Philip Zamora - Friday, March 21, 2003, at 10:51 a.m.
    •    Re: Gettysburg was better  (5253 views)
         Ashi-taka469 - Thursday, April 17, 2003, at 11:32 a.m.
      •    Re: Gettysburg was better  (5047 views)
           Nate Jackson - Friday, April 18, 2003, at 8:31 a.m.
        •    Re: Gettysburg was better  (5114 views)
             Nate - Monday, April 21, 2003, at 10:22 p.m.
          •      Re: Gettysburg was better  (4715 views)    We're Here
               Bryant Hinkle Opeil - Monday, May 2, 2005, at 11:04 a.m.
          •    Re: Gettysburg was better  (4963 views)
               Ashi-taka469 - Monday, May 5, 2003, at 11:19 a.m.


Copyright © 1998-2021, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.