> Wait ... I don't know if you're referring to me, but over the last three
> weeks, I have put forth numerous reasons, and valid points, why I think
> Hooper's score is crap, and I have explained it in as much depth as I
> could.
> That does not qualify as "Hooper hating".

> If you choose to ignore my points, fine ...

> You didn't call anyone names, but you explicitly said, or heavily implied,
> that "people" hate Hooper for the sheer fun of it.
> People do not hate his music for the sake of it, just like you don't
> appreciate it just for its own sake, and it would be rude to say so.

I have read your review *more than once* and yes you do lay out your points very well about why you don't like the score. I do prefer that to if you had hated it and not given a good reason why. but that comment wasn't aimed at you, it was all the rush of Hooper bashing nowadays to a score I don't feel deserves that much venom.

but that's my opinion, others have different. such is life, and we move on