> I stumbled on to Filmtracks review of John William's score for HP1 while
> idly surfing the web to see Fan reaction to the music of recent HP films.
> Of course everyone is entitled to their options, but gad, I've never read
> a review with which I DISAGREED more.

> Whoever wrote the FT review should have his 'reviewer-credentials'
> examined. This score (for HP1) will likely go down as one of JW's most
> memorable and appropriate theme music (next to SW). In contrast to
> Filmtrack review, I thought JW captured beautifully the unique 'magical'
> nature of JK's story.

> Sadly the recent HP movies (4 & 5) have been progressively worse in
> everything from directing to following book plot lines, scripting and
> including music scores. HP5 was pathetic in that regard. I know a lot of
> folks who agree.

> Please - bring back Chris Colubus, Steve Kloves and John Williams. Save us
> from inept reviews like that from Filmtracks.
your an idiot harry potter 4 and 5 arnt bad in fact didnt you visit the critic website the rotten tomatoes that critics rank gof a 88 % out of a 100 while ss only got 78 % and says who that a lot of the fans agree that 4 and 5 sucks thats not what i heard crtics love 4 and 5 doesnt the 88 % of gof ranking on rotton tomatoes mean anything to you and yes i understand everyone is entitled to there own oppinyen's theres no crime about it but by saying every potter fan hates hp 4 and 5 thats crazy have you cross the line or something is there proof no because you have none sorry to burst your bubble but hp 4 and 5 didnt suck check out rotten tomatoes next time to see for yourself its no joke