Clemmensen is no longer relevant. He needs to let someone else have the filmtracks.com domain so they can do something useful with it, not just ramble on for thousands and thousand of words of pointless self-indulgence in these so-called "Reviews".

However: I would like to mount Clemmensen's wife - at least he did something right.

> Clemmensen is no longer relevant. He needs to let someone else have the
> filmtracks.com domain so they can do something useful with it, not just
> ramble on for thousands and thousand of words of pointless self-indulgence
> in these so-called "Reviews".

> However: I would like to mount Clemmensen's wife - at least he did
> something right.

where are pics of the wife?

> where are pics of the wife?

http://www.filmtracks.com/news/updates.cgi?read=33

> http://www.filmtracks.com/news/updates.cgi?read=33

too skinny, not enough boob

> Clemmensen is no longer relevant. He needs to let someone else have the
> filmtracks.com domain so they can do something useful with it, not just
> ramble on for thousands and thousand of words of pointless self-indulgence
> in these so-called "Reviews".

> However: I would like to mount Clemmensen's wife - at least he did
> something right.

Stop thinking with your COCK and appreciate what you get for free, which in your sorry-ass case means Mr. Clemmensen's reviews and not a moistened twat.

> Clemmensen is no longer relevant. He needs to let someone else have the
> filmtracks.com domain so they can do something useful with it, not just
> ramble on for thousands and thousand of words of pointless self-indulgence
> in these so-called "Reviews".

> However: I would like to mount Clemmensen's wife - at least he did
> something right.

Another mention of the wife, fantastic! I'm sure he'll love that remark

A review cannot be a review unless it is in depth and completely detailed to as much extent as the person can write. Some reviews are shorter, yes, but that either goes to show how horrible a score is to bother with words, or it is so impressive it is worth checking out yourself for the experience. The guy over at soundtrack geek, however, is someone you would call irrelevant. He bashed on inception, now he's a fanboy. You're not a true reviewer if you make a statement, only to change it a few months later. Clemmensen at least does not do this, at least I'm sure not very often, if at all. I haven't read all his reviews, so I can be proven wrong here. But the point of the matter is at least we know he is a mature adult male, whereas soundtrack geek, the guy screams out 'mid twenties and an amateur'. Have you got nothing better to do with your life? Apparently not. It's ok, I don't either, but at least I don't bash people unless I state a specific and logical reason for doing so. You just slumped down low, especially after your concluding statement. Give up the internet, it's not really your thing.

> Another mention of the wife, fantastic! I'm sure he'll love that remark

> A review cannot be a review unless it is in depth and completely detailed
> to as much extent as the person can write. Some reviews are shorter, yes,
> but that either goes to show how horrible a score is to bother with words,
> or it is so impressive it is worth checking out yourself for the
> experience. The guy over at soundtrack geek, however, is someone you would
> call irrelevant. He bashed on inception, now he's a fanboy. You're not a
> true reviewer if you make a statement, only to change it a few months
> later. Clemmensen at least does not do this, at least I'm sure not very
> often, if at all. I haven't read all his reviews, so I can be proven wrong
> here. But the point of the matter is at least we know he is a mature adult
> male, whereas soundtrack geek, the guy screams out 'mid twenties and an
> amateur'. Have you got nothing better to do with your life? Apparently
> not. It's ok, I don't either, but at least I don't bash people unless I
> state a specific and logical reason for doing so. You just slumped down
> low, especially after your concluding statement. Give up the internet,
> it's not really your thing.

The lack of proper grammar and spelling in these comments is more unnerving then anything else.