|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: No! It's not.
• Posted by: Sherlock <Send E-Mail>• Date: Friday, July 28, 2006, at 11:30 p.m.
• IP Address: adsl-69-228-55-202.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net
• In Response to:
No! It's not. (nyze aziz)
> i dont think its gave a disgrace to academy coz i think its a excellent
> score.
> i didnt say that braveheart score not good, i just wanna say that its a
> tough competition between il postino, braveheart,, and apollo 13.
> this is b'coz, i've heard all of the nominees for best original score for
> that year.
> il postino n braveheart are among two perfect n excellent scores.
> a/way, im quite confused coz how crouchin tiger hidden dragon won the
> oscar even gladiator score is far more better than it.hmmmmmm
I totally agree with your comment about Gladiator. I also feel the same way about oscar 2006. To me, Pride & Prejudice is a LOT better than Brokeback Mountain.
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- • Can't believe it beat Horner's Braveheart. (6011 views)
Ethan Edwards - Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 3:56 p.m.
- No! It's not. (5839 views)
nyze aziz - Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 5:27 a.m.
-
Re: No! It's not. (6218 views)
Sherlock - Friday, July 28, 2006, at 11:30 p.m.
|
|
|
