|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Oddly, I prefer the '92 release
Michael
<Send E-Mail>(c-67-187-68-244.hsd1.tn.comcast.n
et)
Responses to this Comment:
↓ Faleel |
|
Oddly, I prefer the '92 release |
Sunday, December 30, 2007 (9:57 a.m.) |
|---|
| • Now Playing: Crimson Tide
|
The reviewer was right when he said, "Jaws is not something you can sit and listen to for any great length of time," and I would agree. However, I disagree on two points. First, I think that the 1992 release is a great listening experience, and second, I think its short, half-hour length works to its advantage by finishing before the listener gets sick or bored of the score. I've listened to the Decca release, and quite frankly, I prefer listening to the '92 release.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
Re: Oddly, I prefer the '92 release |
Saturday, November 5, 2011 (11:23 p.m.) |
|---|
| • Now Playing: Feedback
|
> The reviewer was right when he said, "Jaws is not something you can
> sit and listen to for any great length of time," and I would agree.
> However, I disagree on two points. First, I think that the 1992 release is
> a great listening experience, and second, I think its short, half-hour
> length works to its advantage by finishing before the listener gets sick
> or bored of the score. I've listened to the Decca release, and quite
> frankly, I prefer listening to the '92 release.
I prefer the arrangments of the 92 release, but the sound and performance of the Decca.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
|
