Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
     1. The Invisible Man
    2. The Call of the Wild
   3. Sonic the Hedgehog
  4. Birds of Prey: Harley Quinn
 5. Dolittle
6. Bad Boys for Life

       1. Godzilla: King of the Monsters
      2. Romeo and Juliet
     3. The Monkey King
    4. John Williams in Vienna
   5. Space Battleship Yamato
  6. Willow
 7. Ready Player One
8. Ghostbusters
         1. How to Train Your Dragon
        2. Nightmare Before Christmas
       3. Gladiator
      4. Alice in Wonderland
     5. Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
    6. Superman
   7. LOTR: Return of the King
  8. Titanic
 9. Raiders of the Lost Ark
10. Joker
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for Star Wars: The Last Jedi (John Williams)

Edit | Delete
Re: Christian, I'm disappointed in you
• Posted by: Bryn Mercado
• Date: Monday, January 8, 2018, at 8:39 a.m.
• IP Address:
• In Response to: Christian, I'm disappointed in you (Intestinal Worm)

> Hey Christian, have you read this article?

> The points you've made against the film are noticeably the same
> nondescript complaints heard from the highly vocal haters. 'Pacing
> issues'? Watch it again. Viewers experience pacing issues when their
> expectations aren't being met. Yes, it has pacing that's different from
> previous Star Wars films. Guess what? It's a NEW Star Wars film. It should
> have different pacing, otherwise we're just watching the same films again.
> 'Fallacies of logic'? Such as? You didn't specify any. 'Unsatisfactory
> behaviour'? So you wanted Luke to stay the same. Great idea - that sounds
> really interesting and exciting. And I suppose then you'd be complaining
> about lack of character development. 'Pointless subplots' - is a subplot
> pointless because the character's don't succeed in their plan? Maybe it's
> about the characters rather than the plan. One of the main themes of the
> film is characters learning from their mistakes. Who the hell wants to
> watch a film where the heroes never screw up? 'Poor performances by new
> characters' - You mean Rose and Holdo? This seems awfully like personal
> opinion presented as consensus. I haven't heard anyone complain about
> their performances. Is the reason you don't like them because they're
> women?

> Why is Leia using the Force to save herself laughable? Because she's a
> woman? Do you secretly hate women, Christian? A person can survive exposed
> in the vacuum of space for up to 90 seconds before they die of
> asphyxiation. The Force can be used to move objects telekinetically. Even
> the lightest directional force applied to an object in zero gravity will
> send the object in that direction forever unless acted upon by another
> force or object. Leia has the Force - we've seen this. Like Luke, she uses
> Force telekinesis for the first time in a moment of life-or-death
> desperation and pushes herself in the direction of the ship. What's so
> offensive about watching something that makes perfect sense? Is it because
> deep down you can't stand to see a woman save herself?

> Tip: if the critics love a movie, but the kind of shitheads who yell
> things at the screen and storm out of a theatre don't, then the critics
> have it right.

> big grin

Good try but Clemmensen's reviews are horse shit for other reasons. He is a feminazi-supporting libtard. He'd probably want to mash it up with Admiral Holdo.

Comments in this Thread:     Expand >>

Copyright © 1998-2021, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.