|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
The Review of Lord of the Rings score
Ryan Winter
<Send E-Mail>(cache-dp03.proxy.aol.com)
Responses to this Comment:
↓ lotr |
|
The Review of Lord of the Rings score |
Sunday, July 27, 2003 (9:10 p.m.) |
|---|
The score of Lord of the RINGS is fine. But the reviewer on this page must have
something personal against John Williams. The HARRY POTTER score is clearly better. It has a terrific theme that will last forever. The score captures the mystery of magic, the wonder of children and the power of the story.
Lord of the Rings is fine and is great for the film. But Howard Shore is no John Williams. LOL.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
lotr
(tc01-n71-242.de.inter.net)
In Response to:
↑ Ryan Winter |
|
Re: The Review of Lord of the Rings score |
Monday, August 4, 2003 (7:06 a.m.) |
|---|
You're nuts! First of all, the HP score sounds like a mix of Kevin Home Alone and Star Wars, second of all, NO ONE BEATS HOWARD! And don't you tell me HP is better than LOTR.
> The score of Lord of the RINGS is fine. But the reviewer on this page must
> have
something personal against John Williams. The HARRY POTTER score
> is clearly better. It has a terrific theme that will last forever. The
> score captures the mystery of magic, the wonder of children and the power
> of the story.
Lord of the Rings is fine and is great for the film. But
> Howard Shore is no John Williams. LOL.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
|
