|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! > I was really looking forward to spending an afternoon hopefully enjoying
> this movie. I had heard it was great! If I had it to do over again I would
> have saved my money. This movie obviously took a lot of work and I'm sure
> cost a ton of money but that doesn't always mean it is going to be any
> good. For one thing I don't know why whenever someone does a movie with
> knights and wizards that they feel they have to make the movie in that
> wierd "dark" color. I felt like I wanted to constantly adjust my
> color controls. A quick 3 hours? Hardly! There is about 30 minutes of
> actual action and the rest of the time there is either a shot of "the
> ring" or someone in a conversation about a bunch of nonsense... the
> kind of nonsense that disgraces the teachings of Jesus Christ. Give me
> the movie and I could have easily edited out an hour and no one would know
> the difference. There are some great looking monsters and the wizard is
> excellent, but the fight scenes are not as spectacular as people are
> saving (see Braveheart). There are the typical dumb hollywood things like
> the wizard not using his power when he really needs it and Hobbits (who
> did a little training with swords on their way to the mountain) are taking
> out huge orcs that are bred for nothing but to kill, maim and destroy
> anything in their path. The ending is ridiculous, they leave you hanging
> on for the sequel...
> One day Jesus will come back and He will fight evil the right way.
No, offense just some food for thought..... But...You know, I find it odd that Christians, who are supposed to have the corner on forgiveness and doing unto others can be so close minded and uninformed.
A Recovering Christian
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (49942 views)
Steve - Friday, November 8, 2002, at 10:48 a.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (37601 views)
Jessi feathers - Monday, December 27, 2010, at 2:45 p.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (48282 views)
Julio Gomez - Monday, February 13, 2006, at 7:49 a.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (47577 views)
Pope - Wednesday, May 31, 2006, at 2:53 p.m.
- You know what? This guy actually has a point! (47870 views)
Pogel Adler - Saturday, February 18, 2006, at 12:22 p.m.
- Our Convenant With God and The Lord Jesus Christ (47956 views)
Brian Louise - Friday, February 17, 2006, at 8:32 a.m.
- Re: Our Convenant With God and The Lord Jesus Christ (47603 views)
Justin Such - Saturday, March 11, 2006, at 7:07 p.m.
- Re: Our Convenant With God and The Lord Jesus Christ (47806 views)
David M. Bond - Friday, February 17, 2006, at 9:57 a.m.
- Re: Our Convenant With God and The Lord Jesus Christ (47760 views)
Julio Gomez - Friday, February 17, 2006, at 9:51 a.m.
- Re: Our Convenant With God and The Lord Jesus Christ (47632 views)
Jonathan Broxton - Friday, February 17, 2006, at 8:41 a.m.
- You do know that this is a website about SOUNDTRACKS? (47893 views)
huntress - Thursday, January 26, 2006, at 12:37 a.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (47846 views)
Chris - Monday, November 18, 2002, at 7:16 p.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (47886 views)
A.G.F. - Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 3:31 p.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (48167 views)
Justice - Friday, November 8, 2002, at 5:04 p.m.
- All those who think LOTR has no biblical references, PLEASE READ THIS! (55138 views)
Dan Sartori - Monday, November 18, 2002, at 3:00 p.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (48154 views)
Kevin - Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 1:28 p.m.
- I second that (47936 views)
Ashi-taka469 - Monday, November 11, 2002, at 10:28 p.m.
- Re: I second that (47489 views)
Amras Tasardur - Thursday, May 11, 2006, at 8:50 p.m.
|
|
|
|