|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: I second that
Posted by: Amras Tasardur Date: Thursday, May 11, 2006, at 8:50 p.m.
IP Address: livmainborder.wispwest.net
In Response to:
I second that (Ashi-taka469)
> As for the remainder of
> the original post, I really have little to say, given that it is the most
> common criticism I've seen among critics; not enough action, too long, and
> (although it wasn't used in this instance) believe it or not, not enough
> sex (astonished gasps all around and a lady faints in the background).
> Critics today are much too jaded.
Ummmm...... 'not enough action' obviously implies that there was SOME, so what would 'not enough sex' imply? Hmmmmmm.
I seem to remember there being absolutely NO SEX in any of the three (and I just watched them again weeks ago). It would have been superlatively, incredibly, astonishingly disgraceful to Tolkien, the books, and their fans if that were the case!
Is that REALLY what the critics said? Maybe there was an alternate version to slightly appease the jaded critics (J/K)? LOL!
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (40089 views)
Steve - Friday, November 8, 2002, at 10:48 a.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (27716 views)
Jessi feathers - Monday, December 27, 2010, at 2:45 p.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (38334 views)
Julio Gomez - Monday, February 13, 2006, at 7:49 a.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (37721 views)
Pope - Wednesday, May 31, 2006, at 2:53 p.m.
- You know what? This guy actually has a point! (38013 views)
Pogel Adler - Saturday, February 18, 2006, at 12:22 p.m.
- Our Convenant With God and The Lord Jesus Christ (38101 views)
Brian Louise - Friday, February 17, 2006, at 8:32 a.m.
- Re: Our Convenant With God and The Lord Jesus Christ (37776 views)
Justin Such - Saturday, March 11, 2006, at 7:07 p.m.
- Re: Our Convenant With God and The Lord Jesus Christ (37938 views)
David M. Bond - Friday, February 17, 2006, at 9:57 a.m.
- Re: Our Convenant With God and The Lord Jesus Christ (37851 views)
Julio Gomez - Friday, February 17, 2006, at 9:51 a.m.
- Re: Our Convenant With God and The Lord Jesus Christ (37762 views)
Jonathan Broxton - Friday, February 17, 2006, at 8:41 a.m.
- You do know that this is a website about SOUNDTRACKS? (38038 views)
huntress - Thursday, January 26, 2006, at 12:37 a.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (37997 views)
Chris - Monday, November 18, 2002, at 7:16 p.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (38020 views)
A.G.F. - Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 3:31 p.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (38230 views)
Justice - Friday, November 8, 2002, at 5:04 p.m.
- All those who think LOTR has no biblical references, PLEASE READ THIS! (45188 views)
Dan Sartori - Monday, November 18, 2002, at 3:00 p.m.
- Re: Praise the LORD and SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST, not the Lord of the Rings! (38300 views)
Kevin - Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 1:28 p.m.
- I second that (38062 views)
Ashi-taka469 - Monday, November 11, 2002, at 10:28 p.m.
-
Re: I second that (37611 views)
Amras Tasardur - Thursday, May 11, 2006, at 8:50 p.m.
|
|
|
|