|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Decent but throwaway score, no more than three stars.
|
|
Decent but throwaway score, no more than three stars. |
Saturday, November 6, 2010 (5:54 a.m.) |
|---|
I agree with the text of your review...but not with your rating. I did not find any tracks in Megamind that warranted a repeat listen; they were all pleasant but I won't be revisiting them anytime soon. I find it interesting that you give this score the same rating as the far superior Chicken Run, and a higher rating than Robots, Bolt, either Ice Age score or Horton Hears a Who! - all of which are more consistent, contain memorable themes/highlights and are better developed over greater length when compared to this little album.
And I know I have this score rated as **** on my profile as well, but that simply reflects the smooth listening experience (and I'm looking for a reason to knock it down, because I don't feel it deserves those four). A score with this little substance should, from a reviewer's PoV, not get more than ***.
Or, to put it another way: this score is equal to the sum of all three Pirates of the Caribbean scores? Nuh-uh. No way, José.
Even Despicable Me had a more engaging score...a shame it hasn't been released commercially.
(Message edited on Monday, November 8, 2010, at 9:53 a.m.)
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
Re: Decent but throwaway score, no more than three stars. |
Tuesday, November 30, 2010 (10:14 a.m.) |
|---|
Even with the explanation you offered up, criticising a review for giving 4-stars to something you also gave 4-stars to makes no sense whatsoever.
> I agree with the text of your review...but not with your rating. I did not
> find any tracks in Megamind that warranted a repeat listen; they
> were all pleasant but I won't be revisiting them anytime soon. I find it
> interesting that you give this score the same rating as the far
> superior Chicken Run, and a higher rating than Robots,
> Bolt, either Ice Age score or Horton Hears a Who! -
> all of which are more consistent, contain memorable themes/highlights and
> are better developed over greater length when compared to this little
> album.
> And I know I have this score rated as **** on my profile as well, but that
> simply reflects the smooth listening experience (and I'm looking for a
> reason to knock it down, because I don't feel it deserves those four). A
> score with this little substance should, from a reviewer's PoV, not get
> more than ***.
> Or, to put it another way: this score is equal to the sum of all three
> Pirates of the Caribbean scores? Nuh-uh. No way, José.
> Even Despicable Me had a more engaging score...a shame it hasn't
> been released commercially.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
|