|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: what is WRONG with you people??? Hello Sari. I disagree with you on "they're two completely different religions". If you would take initiative to read about paganism you will realize that they are not that different as you would have them to be. It would also lighten your load of obviouse anger towards us pagans, once you understand them better. As someone already has mentioned todays modern paganism is based on the ancient earth religion that also christianity has taken up some things from.
I urge you to read the fantastic book "the mists of avalon" if you liked the movie. There are also many interesting views from king arthurs wife (can't spell her name), a pios christian. The authur is Marion Zimmer Bradley.
Blessed be in love and light.
Thea
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- • The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94345 views)
Ken Moody - Monday, July 30, 2001, at 7:09 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89739 views)
Claudia - Tuesday, April 6, 2004, at 1:43 p.m.
- Delightful, not porno (89941 views)
Shayanne - Monday, May 6, 2002, at 8:53 a.m.
- Not porno... (89860 views)
Susana - Sunday, December 28, 2003, at 9:25 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! - Sick Man (89912 views)
Avalon Believer - Sunday, September 7, 2003, at 7:30 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89697 views)
O. - Monday, September 1, 2003, at 10:22 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89794 views)
Theia - Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 5:34 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89897 views)
Karina Spiegel - Monday, December 16, 2002, at 11:03 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89479 views)
Annie Hoffman - Monday, December 16, 2002, at 10:55 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89733 views)
Silver - Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 8:11 p.m.
- Re: That´s going a bit too far... (89426 views)
BB_GiRl - Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 7:50 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89523 views)
opalzephyrstar - Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 5:46 p.m.
- religious aspect should have been omitted (90070 views)
Robin Von Kreiger Ph.D. - Thursday, September 12, 2002, at 1:12 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89548 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:16 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89906 views)
Chris - Tuesday, July 23, 2002, at 5:59 a.m.
- Boy that stinks! (89449 views)
Bobettechaude - Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 7:41 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90212 views)
Jessica Dey - Monday, July 8, 2002, at 9:29 p.m.
- Calling it porn is a bit much. (89704 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 3:29 p.m.
- How dare you?! (89753 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:36 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90322 views)
linz - Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 6:53 p.m.
- Why is everyone against me? (90640 views)
Imara - Friday, May 17, 2002, at 11:23 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89387 views)
Ivy - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 12:11 p.m.
- What's wrong with The Mists of Avalon? (90032 views)
Elza, Wicca worshipper - Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 11:21 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89171 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:28 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! - Please read. (89864 views)
Logray - Friday, April 5, 2002, at 12:22 p.m.
- holier than thou (90121 views)
James - Friday, March 22, 2002, at 7:24 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (91134 views)
Lady Vivienne - Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 7:24 p.m.
- Yeah right. (90037 views)
Amber - Monday, March 18, 2002, at 9:51 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90207 views)
Lacy York - Monday, February 25, 2002, at 5:39 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89771 views)
Stephano di Galeotti - Friday, February 22, 2002, at 12:29 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89482 views)
Robert - Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 8:21 p.m.
- The Old Religon (91039 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 7:34 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (89295 views)
tina - Monday, August 30, 2004, at 11:03 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (89209 views)
THE IMPERIALITE - Tuesday, June 15, 2004, at 5:16 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (89332 views)
follower of the old believe - Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 11:12 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (89576 views)
mike - Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 10:47 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89507 views)
Patrícia Conceição - Monday, January 21, 2002, at 2:50 a.m.
- This is not Pornography (89790 views)
Edward Attertonino - Monday, November 19, 2001, at 3:24 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89741 views)
Cathey - Friday, November 30, 2001, at 7:08 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89718 views)
Morgan - Wednesday, September 26, 2001, at 8:05 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89512 views)
Huntress - Friday, September 7, 2001, at 1:31 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89752 views)
Adam J. Wahlberg - Tuesday, August 7, 2001, at 12:13 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89714 views)
Nyara - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 10:27 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (85849 views)
sidhe in disguise - Saturday, August 4, 2007, at 8:47 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89364 views)
Isolda - Tuesday, February 14, 2006, at 8:02 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89199 views)
mariah - Monday, July 4, 2005, at 6:29 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89181 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:35 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89219 views)
Gabrielle - Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 3:27 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89610 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:51 a.m.
- Let the pagans believe what they want... (89377 views)
Bindner - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 5:17 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89275 views)
Derwen Vala - Friday, June 7, 2002, at 6:50 p.m.
- Can't be Pornography! (89881 views)
Chris - Thursday, August 9, 2001, at 2:35 a.m.
- Bah! You lied.
 (89981 views)
C. Hook - Sunday, August 5, 2001, at 5:42 p.m.
- Proof Arthur existed (89421 views)
Mia - Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 1:06 p.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (89306 views)
Candice - Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 7:56 a.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (89267 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:41 p.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (89544 views)
Mia - Tuesday, May 7, 2002, at 4:33 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89799 views)
HJA - Saturday, August 4, 2001, at 2:05 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89599 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 10:28 p.m.
- This is total nonsense... (90240 views)
Christian Clemmensen - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 10:55 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89948 views)
Scott O'Connell - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 8:01 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90010 views)
between a mother and son - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 7:15 a.m.
- what is WRONG with you people??? (89550 views)
Sari - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 10:44 a.m.
-
Re: what is WRONG with you people??? (89524 views)
Thea - Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 10:18 a.m.
- Re: what is WRONG with you people??? (89378 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:01 p.m.
- Ridiculous........ Porn? (90192 views)
Lloyd R. Belthazar - Friday, June 7, 2002, at 10:11 p.m.
- Go figure, monkey-man! (89766 views)
Bindner - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 4:50 p.m.
- Re: Go figure, monkey-man! (83155 views)
LupineMoon - Friday, April 25, 2008, at 4:10 a.m.
- Re: Go figure, monkey-man! (89296 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:59 p.m.
- bull! (89359 views)
noemi - Monday, July 8, 2002, at 12:06 p.m.
- What?! (89367 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 12:34 p.m.
- Babble on Jesus. (89506 views)
Lloyd R. Belthazar - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 5:10 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89526 views)
Gabrielle - Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 3:33 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89694 views)
Miz - Sunday, August 5, 2001, at 2:11 p.m.
|
|
|
|
