|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Why is everyone against me?
• Posted by: the Virgin Huntress • Date: Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:16 a.m.
• IP Address: adsl-66-72-22-241.dsl.sbndin.ameritech.net
• In Response to:
Why is everyone against me? (Imara)
> Why is everyone against me. I'm pagan, i am not all into sex. I hate it
> when people assume that i'm into oragies and the rest. People read books
> or see movies like Mists of Avalon and think that we'er all Pornstars
> AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I HATE YOU ALL. 
I am a christian, but I have absolutely nothing against pagans.  I do not even have the idea in my mind of you being a pornstar! I believe in other faiths and religons outside my own. One of the best parts in this movie is the message of there is our God of Heaven and our Goddess of the Earth. Why can't everyone take that comment and believe it? 
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- • The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (97595 views)
Ken Moody - Monday, July 30, 2001, at 7:09 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92912 views)
Claudia - Tuesday, April 6, 2004, at 1:43 p.m.
- Delightful, not porno (93111 views)
Shayanne - Monday, May 6, 2002, at 8:53 a.m.
- Not porno... (93061 views)
Susana - Sunday, December 28, 2003, at 9:25 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! - Sick Man (93092 views)
Avalon Believer - Sunday, September 7, 2003, at 7:30 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92881 views)
O. - Monday, September 1, 2003, at 10:22 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92966 views)
Theia - Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 5:34 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93071 views)
Karina Spiegel - Monday, December 16, 2002, at 11:03 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92653 views)
Annie Hoffman - Monday, December 16, 2002, at 10:55 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92903 views)
Silver - Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 8:11 p.m.
- Re: That´s going a bit too far... (92597 views)
BB_GiRl - Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 7:50 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92694 views)
opalzephyrstar - Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 5:46 p.m.
- religious aspect should have been omitted (93238 views)
Robin Von Kreiger Ph.D. - Thursday, September 12, 2002, at 1:12 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92718 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:16 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93091 views)
Chris - Tuesday, July 23, 2002, at 5:59 a.m.
- Boy that stinks! (92632 views)
Bobettechaude - Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 7:41 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93380 views)
Jessica Dey - Monday, July 8, 2002, at 9:29 p.m.
- Calling it porn is a bit much. (92879 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 3:29 p.m.
- How dare you?! (92932 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:36 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93520 views)
linz - Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 6:53 p.m.
- Why is everyone against me? (93955 views)
Imara - Friday, May 17, 2002, at 11:23 a.m.
-
Re: Why is everyone against me? (93090 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:16 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92551 views)
Ivy - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 12:11 p.m.
- What's wrong with The Mists of Avalon? (93211 views)
Elza, Wicca worshipper - Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 11:21 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92341 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:28 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! - Please read. (93051 views)
Logray - Friday, April 5, 2002, at 12:22 p.m.
- holier than thou (93286 views)
James - Friday, March 22, 2002, at 7:24 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94324 views)
Lady Vivienne - Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 7:24 p.m.
- Yeah right. (93217 views)
Amber - Monday, March 18, 2002, at 9:51 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93380 views)
Lacy York - Monday, February 25, 2002, at 5:39 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92951 views)
Stephano di Galeotti - Friday, February 22, 2002, at 12:29 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92656 views)
Robert - Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 8:21 p.m.
- The Old Religon (94209 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 7:34 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (92473 views)
tina - Monday, August 30, 2004, at 11:03 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (92393 views)
THE IMPERIALITE - Tuesday, June 15, 2004, at 5:16 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (92504 views)
follower of the old believe - Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 11:12 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (92747 views)
mike - Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 10:47 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92683 views)
Patrícia Conceição - Monday, January 21, 2002, at 2:50 a.m.
- This is not Pornography (92956 views)
Edward Attertonino - Monday, November 19, 2001, at 3:24 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92913 views)
Cathey - Friday, November 30, 2001, at 7:08 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92881 views)
Morgan - Wednesday, September 26, 2001, at 8:05 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92707 views)
Huntress - Friday, September 7, 2001, at 1:31 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92917 views)
Adam J. Wahlberg - Tuesday, August 7, 2001, at 12:13 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92907 views)
Nyara - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 10:27 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89022 views)
sidhe in disguise - Saturday, August 4, 2007, at 8:47 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92548 views)
Isolda - Tuesday, February 14, 2006, at 8:02 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92365 views)
mariah - Monday, July 4, 2005, at 6:29 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92352 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:35 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92385 views)
Gabrielle - Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 3:27 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92781 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:51 a.m.
- Let the pagans believe what they want... (92539 views)
Bindner - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 5:17 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92442 views)
Derwen Vala - Friday, June 7, 2002, at 6:50 p.m.
- Can't be Pornography! (93068 views)
Chris - Thursday, August 9, 2001, at 2:35 a.m.
- Bah! You lied. (93147 views)
C. Hook - Sunday, August 5, 2001, at 5:42 p.m.
- Proof Arthur existed (92591 views)
Mia - Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 1:06 p.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (92476 views)
Candice - Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 7:56 a.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (92434 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:41 p.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (92726 views)
Mia - Tuesday, May 7, 2002, at 4:33 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92991 views)
HJA - Saturday, August 4, 2001, at 2:05 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92771 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 10:28 p.m.
- This is total nonsense... (93424 views)
Christian Clemmensen - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 10:55 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93123 views)
Scott O'Connell - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 8:01 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93180 views)
between a mother and son - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 7:15 a.m.
- what is WRONG with you people??? (92716 views)
Sari - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 10:44 a.m.
- Ridiculous........ Porn? (93386 views)
Lloyd R. Belthazar - Friday, June 7, 2002, at 10:11 p.m.
- Go figure, monkey-man! (92936 views)
Bindner - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 4:50 p.m.
- Re: Go figure, monkey-man! (86327 views)
LupineMoon - Friday, April 25, 2008, at 4:10 a.m.
- Re: Go figure, monkey-man! (92463 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:59 p.m.
- bull! (92532 views)
noemi - Monday, July 8, 2002, at 12:06 p.m.
- What?! (92533 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 12:34 p.m.
- Babble on Jesus. (92661 views)
Lloyd R. Belthazar - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 5:10 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92708 views)
Gabrielle - Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 3:33 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92873 views)
Miz - Sunday, August 5, 2001, at 2:11 p.m.
|
|
|
|
