|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Why is everyone against me?
• Posted by: the Virgin Huntress • Date: Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:16 a.m.
• IP Address: adsl-66-72-22-241.dsl.sbndin.ameritech.net
• In Response to:
Why is everyone against me? (Imara)
> Why is everyone against me. I'm pagan, i am not all into sex. I hate it
> when people assume that i'm into oragies and the rest. People read books
> or see movies like Mists of Avalon and think that we'er all Pornstars
> AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I HATE YOU ALL. 
I am a christian, but I have absolutely nothing against pagans.  I do not even have the idea in my mind of you being a pornstar! I believe in other faiths and religons outside my own. One of the best parts in this movie is the message of there is our God of Heaven and our Goddess of the Earth. Why can't everyone take that comment and believe it? 
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- • The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (95569 views)
Ken Moody - Monday, July 30, 2001, at 7:09 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90906 views)
Claudia - Tuesday, April 6, 2004, at 1:43 p.m.
- Delightful, not porno (91103 views)
Shayanne - Monday, May 6, 2002, at 8:53 a.m.
- Not porno... (91036 views)
Susana - Sunday, December 28, 2003, at 9:25 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! - Sick Man (91081 views)
Avalon Believer - Sunday, September 7, 2003, at 7:30 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90867 views)
O. - Monday, September 1, 2003, at 10:22 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90961 views)
Theia - Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 5:34 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (91061 views)
Karina Spiegel - Monday, December 16, 2002, at 11:03 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90643 views)
Annie Hoffman - Monday, December 16, 2002, at 10:55 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90898 views)
Silver - Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 8:11 p.m.
- Re: That´s going a bit too far... (90591 views)
BB_GiRl - Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 7:50 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90688 views)
opalzephyrstar - Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 5:46 p.m.
- religious aspect should have been omitted (91232 views)
Robin Von Kreiger Ph.D. - Thursday, September 12, 2002, at 1:12 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90710 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:16 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (91083 views)
Chris - Tuesday, July 23, 2002, at 5:59 a.m.
- Boy that stinks! (90614 views)
Bobettechaude - Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 7:41 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (91377 views)
Jessica Dey - Monday, July 8, 2002, at 9:29 p.m.
- Calling it porn is a bit much. (90870 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 3:29 p.m.
- How dare you?! (90923 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:36 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (91504 views)
linz - Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 6:53 p.m.
- Why is everyone against me? (91939 views)
Imara - Friday, May 17, 2002, at 11:23 a.m.
-
Re: Why is everyone against me? (91064 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:16 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90547 views)
Ivy - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 12:11 p.m.
- What's wrong with The Mists of Avalon? (91200 views)
Elza, Wicca worshipper - Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 11:21 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90332 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:28 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! - Please read. (91041 views)
Logray - Friday, April 5, 2002, at 12:22 p.m.
- holier than thou (91283 views)
James - Friday, March 22, 2002, at 7:24 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (92308 views)
Lady Vivienne - Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 7:24 p.m.
- Yeah right. (91210 views)
Amber - Monday, March 18, 2002, at 9:51 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (91376 views)
Lacy York - Monday, February 25, 2002, at 5:39 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90937 views)
Stephano di Galeotti - Friday, February 22, 2002, at 12:29 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90651 views)
Robert - Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 8:21 p.m.
- The Old Religon (92206 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 7:34 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (90462 views)
tina - Monday, August 30, 2004, at 11:03 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (90381 views)
THE IMPERIALITE - Tuesday, June 15, 2004, at 5:16 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (90496 views)
follower of the old believe - Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 11:12 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (90744 views)
mike - Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 10:47 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90674 views)
Patrícia Conceição - Monday, January 21, 2002, at 2:50 a.m.
- This is not Pornography (90955 views)
Edward Attertonino - Monday, November 19, 2001, at 3:24 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90907 views)
Cathey - Friday, November 30, 2001, at 7:08 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90877 views)
Morgan - Wednesday, September 26, 2001, at 8:05 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90681 views)
Huntress - Friday, September 7, 2001, at 1:31 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90913 views)
Adam J. Wahlberg - Tuesday, August 7, 2001, at 12:13 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90892 views)
Nyara - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 10:27 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (87013 views)
sidhe in disguise - Saturday, August 4, 2007, at 8:47 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90532 views)
Isolda - Tuesday, February 14, 2006, at 8:02 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90359 views)
mariah - Monday, July 4, 2005, at 6:29 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90346 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:35 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90379 views)
Gabrielle - Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 3:27 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90776 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:51 a.m.
- Let the pagans believe what they want... (90537 views)
Bindner - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 5:17 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90440 views)
Derwen Vala - Friday, June 7, 2002, at 6:50 p.m.
- Can't be Pornography! (91053 views)
Chris - Thursday, August 9, 2001, at 2:35 a.m.
- Bah! You lied. (91143 views)
C. Hook - Sunday, August 5, 2001, at 5:42 p.m.
- Proof Arthur existed (90584 views)
Mia - Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 1:06 p.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (90472 views)
Candice - Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 7:56 a.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (90428 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:41 p.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (90717 views)
Mia - Tuesday, May 7, 2002, at 4:33 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90972 views)
HJA - Saturday, August 4, 2001, at 2:05 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90763 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 10:28 p.m.
- This is total nonsense... (91411 views)
Christian Clemmensen - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 10:55 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (91111 views)
Scott O'Connell - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 8:01 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (91169 views)
between a mother and son - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 7:15 a.m.
- what is WRONG with you people??? (90712 views)
Sari - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 10:44 a.m.
- Ridiculous........ Porn? (91365 views)
Lloyd R. Belthazar - Friday, June 7, 2002, at 10:11 p.m.
- Go figure, monkey-man! (90925 views)
Bindner - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 4:50 p.m.
- Re: Go figure, monkey-man! (84316 views)
LupineMoon - Friday, April 25, 2008, at 4:10 a.m.
- Re: Go figure, monkey-man! (90457 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:59 p.m.
- bull! (90526 views)
noemi - Monday, July 8, 2002, at 12:06 p.m.
- What?! (90532 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 12:34 p.m.
- Babble on Jesus. (90663 views)
Lloyd R. Belthazar - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 5:10 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90690 views)
Gabrielle - Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 3:33 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90861 views)
Miz - Sunday, August 5, 2001, at 2:11 p.m.
|
|
|
|
