|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Why is everyone against me?
• Posted by: the Virgin Huntress • Date: Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:16 a.m.
• IP Address: adsl-66-72-22-241.dsl.sbndin.ameritech.net
• In Response to:
Why is everyone against me? (Imara)
> Why is everyone against me. I'm pagan, i am not all into sex. I hate it
> when people assume that i'm into oragies and the rest. People read books
> or see movies like Mists of Avalon and think that we'er all Pornstars
> AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I HATE YOU ALL. 
I am a christian, but I have absolutely nothing against pagans.  I do not even have the idea in my mind of you being a pornstar! I believe in other faiths and religons outside my own. One of the best parts in this movie is the message of there is our God of Heaven and our Goddess of the Earth. Why can't everyone take that comment and believe it? 
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- • The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94728 views)
Ken Moody - Monday, July 30, 2001, at 7:09 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90117 views)
Claudia - Tuesday, April 6, 2004, at 1:43 p.m.
- Delightful, not porno (90320 views)
Shayanne - Monday, May 6, 2002, at 8:53 a.m.
- Not porno... (90243 views)
Susana - Sunday, December 28, 2003, at 9:25 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! - Sick Man (90289 views)
Avalon Believer - Sunday, September 7, 2003, at 7:30 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90078 views)
O. - Monday, September 1, 2003, at 10:22 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90174 views)
Theia - Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 5:34 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90276 views)
Karina Spiegel - Monday, December 16, 2002, at 11:03 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89857 views)
Annie Hoffman - Monday, December 16, 2002, at 10:55 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90112 views)
Silver - Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 8:11 p.m.
- Re: That´s going a bit too far... (89805 views)
BB_GiRl - Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 7:50 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89902 views)
opalzephyrstar - Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 5:46 p.m.
- religious aspect should have been omitted (90447 views)
Robin Von Kreiger Ph.D. - Thursday, September 12, 2002, at 1:12 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89924 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:16 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90290 views)
Chris - Tuesday, July 23, 2002, at 5:59 a.m.
- Boy that stinks! (89825 views)
Bobettechaude - Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 7:41 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90591 views)
Jessica Dey - Monday, July 8, 2002, at 9:29 p.m.
- Calling it porn is a bit much. (90086 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 3:29 p.m.
- How dare you?! (90134 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:36 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90706 views)
linz - Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 6:53 p.m.
- Why is everyone against me? (91026 views)
Imara - Friday, May 17, 2002, at 11:23 a.m.
-
Re: Why is everyone against me? (90266 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:16 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89765 views)
Ivy - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 12:11 p.m.
- What's wrong with The Mists of Avalon? (90412 views)
Elza, Wicca worshipper - Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 11:21 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89548 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:28 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! - Please read. (90249 views)
Logray - Friday, April 5, 2002, at 12:22 p.m.
- holier than thou (90498 views)
James - Friday, March 22, 2002, at 7:24 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (91517 views)
Lady Vivienne - Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 7:24 p.m.
- Yeah right. (90418 views)
Amber - Monday, March 18, 2002, at 9:51 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90587 views)
Lacy York - Monday, February 25, 2002, at 5:39 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90149 views)
Stephano di Galeotti - Friday, February 22, 2002, at 12:29 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89860 views)
Robert - Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 8:21 p.m.
- The Old Religon (91420 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 7:34 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (89674 views)
tina - Monday, August 30, 2004, at 11:03 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (89591 views)
THE IMPERIALITE - Tuesday, June 15, 2004, at 5:16 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (89713 views)
follower of the old believe - Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 11:12 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (89961 views)
mike - Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 10:47 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89884 views)
Patrícia Conceição - Monday, January 21, 2002, at 2:50 a.m.
- This is not Pornography (90167 views)
Edward Attertonino - Monday, November 19, 2001, at 3:24 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90118 views)
Cathey - Friday, November 30, 2001, at 7:08 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90095 views)
Morgan - Wednesday, September 26, 2001, at 8:05 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89892 views)
Huntress - Friday, September 7, 2001, at 1:31 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90128 views)
Adam J. Wahlberg - Tuesday, August 7, 2001, at 12:13 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90096 views)
Nyara - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 10:27 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (86228 views)
sidhe in disguise - Saturday, August 4, 2007, at 8:47 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89742 views)
Isolda - Tuesday, February 14, 2006, at 8:02 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89576 views)
mariah - Monday, July 4, 2005, at 6:29 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89560 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:35 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89596 views)
Gabrielle - Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 3:27 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89989 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:51 a.m.
- Let the pagans believe what they want... (89753 views)
Bindner - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 5:17 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89653 views)
Derwen Vala - Friday, June 7, 2002, at 6:50 p.m.
- Can't be Pornography! (90265 views)
Chris - Thursday, August 9, 2001, at 2:35 a.m.
- Bah! You lied. (90359 views)
C. Hook - Sunday, August 5, 2001, at 5:42 p.m.
- Proof Arthur existed (89799 views)
Mia - Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 1:06 p.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (89685 views)
Candice - Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 7:56 a.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (89645 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:41 p.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (89922 views)
Mia - Tuesday, May 7, 2002, at 4:33 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90176 views)
HJA - Saturday, August 4, 2001, at 2:05 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89979 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 10:28 p.m.
- This is total nonsense... (90618 views)
Christian Clemmensen - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 10:55 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90327 views)
Scott O'Connell - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 8:01 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90386 views)
between a mother and son - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 7:15 a.m.
- what is WRONG with you people??? (89926 views)
Sari - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 10:44 a.m.
- Ridiculous........ Porn? (90576 views)
Lloyd R. Belthazar - Friday, June 7, 2002, at 10:11 p.m.
- Go figure, monkey-man! (90142 views)
Bindner - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 4:50 p.m.
- Re: Go figure, monkey-man! (83533 views)
LupineMoon - Friday, April 25, 2008, at 4:10 a.m.
- Re: Go figure, monkey-man! (89672 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:59 p.m.
- bull! (89741 views)
noemi - Monday, July 8, 2002, at 12:06 p.m.
- What?! (89747 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 12:34 p.m.
- Babble on Jesus. (89882 views)
Lloyd R. Belthazar - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 5:10 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (89904 views)
Gabrielle - Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 3:33 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90076 views)
Miz - Sunday, August 5, 2001, at 2:11 p.m.
|
|
|
|
