|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Why is everyone against me?
• Posted by: the Virgin Huntress • Date: Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:16 a.m.
• IP Address: adsl-66-72-22-241.dsl.sbndin.ameritech.net
• In Response to:
Why is everyone against me? (Imara)
> Why is everyone against me. I'm pagan, i am not all into sex. I hate it
> when people assume that i'm into oragies and the rest. People read books
> or see movies like Mists of Avalon and think that we'er all Pornstars
> AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I HATE YOU ALL. 
I am a christian, but I have absolutely nothing against pagans.  I do not even have the idea in my mind of you being a pornstar! I believe in other faiths and religons outside my own. One of the best parts in this movie is the message of there is our God of Heaven and our Goddess of the Earth. Why can't everyone take that comment and believe it? 
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- • The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (98859 views)
Ken Moody - Monday, July 30, 2001, at 7:09 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94171 views)
Claudia - Tuesday, April 6, 2004, at 1:43 p.m.
- Delightful, not porno (94376 views)
Shayanne - Monday, May 6, 2002, at 8:53 a.m.
- Not porno... (94322 views)
Susana - Sunday, December 28, 2003, at 9:25 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! - Sick Man (94352 views)
Avalon Believer - Sunday, September 7, 2003, at 7:30 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94142 views)
O. - Monday, September 1, 2003, at 10:22 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94229 views)
Theia - Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 5:34 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94335 views)
Karina Spiegel - Monday, December 16, 2002, at 11:03 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93917 views)
Annie Hoffman - Monday, December 16, 2002, at 10:55 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94165 views)
Silver - Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 8:11 p.m.
- Re: That´s going a bit too far... (93854 views)
BB_GiRl - Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 7:50 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93956 views)
opalzephyrstar - Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 5:46 p.m.
- religious aspect should have been omitted (94499 views)
Robin Von Kreiger Ph.D. - Thursday, September 12, 2002, at 1:12 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93979 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:16 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94349 views)
Chris - Tuesday, July 23, 2002, at 5:59 a.m.
- Boy that stinks! (93896 views)
Bobettechaude - Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 7:41 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94641 views)
Jessica Dey - Monday, July 8, 2002, at 9:29 p.m.
- Calling it porn is a bit much. (94140 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 3:29 p.m.
- How dare you?! (94199 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:36 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94787 views)
linz - Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 6:53 p.m.
- Why is everyone against me? (95219 views)
Imara - Friday, May 17, 2002, at 11:23 a.m.
-
Re: Why is everyone against me? (94362 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:16 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93811 views)
Ivy - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 12:11 p.m.
- What's wrong with The Mists of Avalon? (94474 views)
Elza, Wicca worshipper - Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 11:21 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93603 views)
Gabrielle - Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 1:28 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! - Please read. (94311 views)
Logray - Friday, April 5, 2002, at 12:22 p.m.
- holier than thou (94546 views)
James - Friday, March 22, 2002, at 7:24 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (95586 views)
Lady Vivienne - Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 7:24 p.m.
- Yeah right. (94478 views)
Amber - Monday, March 18, 2002, at 9:51 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94641 views)
Lacy York - Monday, February 25, 2002, at 5:39 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94210 views)
Stephano di Galeotti - Friday, February 22, 2002, at 12:29 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93920 views)
Robert - Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 8:21 p.m.
- The Old Religon (95471 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 7:34 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (93737 views)
tina - Monday, August 30, 2004, at 11:03 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (93654 views)
THE IMPERIALITE - Tuesday, June 15, 2004, at 5:16 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (93764 views)
follower of the old believe - Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 11:12 p.m.
- Re: The Old Religon (94005 views)
mike - Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 10:47 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93944 views)
Patrícia Conceição - Monday, January 21, 2002, at 2:50 a.m.
- This is not Pornography (94219 views)
Edward Attertonino - Monday, November 19, 2001, at 3:24 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94177 views)
Cathey - Friday, November 30, 2001, at 7:08 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94143 views)
Morgan - Wednesday, September 26, 2001, at 8:05 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93970 views)
Huntress - Friday, September 7, 2001, at 1:31 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94178 views)
Adam J. Wahlberg - Tuesday, August 7, 2001, at 12:13 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94171 views)
Nyara - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 10:27 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (90285 views)
sidhe in disguise - Saturday, August 4, 2007, at 8:47 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93811 views)
Isolda - Tuesday, February 14, 2006, at 8:02 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93629 views)
mariah - Monday, July 4, 2005, at 6:29 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93614 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:35 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93645 views)
Gabrielle - Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 3:27 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94046 views)
the Virgin Huntress - Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 9:51 a.m.
- Let the pagans believe what they want... (93798 views)
Bindner - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 5:17 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93702 views)
Derwen Vala - Friday, June 7, 2002, at 6:50 p.m.
- Can't be Pornography! (94333 views)
Chris - Thursday, August 9, 2001, at 2:35 a.m.
- Bah! You lied. (94405 views)
C. Hook - Sunday, August 5, 2001, at 5:42 p.m.
- Proof Arthur existed (93854 views)
Mia - Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 1:06 p.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (93737 views)
Candice - Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 7:56 a.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (93697 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:41 p.m.
- Re: Bah! You lied. (93992 views)
Mia - Tuesday, May 7, 2002, at 4:33 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94271 views)
HJA - Saturday, August 4, 2001, at 2:05 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94030 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 10:28 p.m.
- This is total nonsense... (94691 views)
Christian Clemmensen - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 10:55 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94384 views)
Scott O'Connell - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 8:01 a.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94443 views)
between a mother and son - Tuesday, July 31, 2001, at 7:15 a.m.
- what is WRONG with you people??? (93977 views)
Sari - Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 10:44 a.m.
- Ridiculous........ Porn? (94656 views)
Lloyd R. Belthazar - Friday, June 7, 2002, at 10:11 p.m.
- Go figure, monkey-man! (94201 views)
Bindner - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 4:50 p.m.
- Re: Go figure, monkey-man! (87584 views)
LupineMoon - Friday, April 25, 2008, at 4:10 a.m.
- Re: Go figure, monkey-man! (93723 views)
Meklorka - Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:59 p.m.
- bull! (93795 views)
noemi - Monday, July 8, 2002, at 12:06 p.m.
- What?! (93796 views)
Bindner - Tuesday, July 9, 2002, at 12:34 p.m.
- Babble on Jesus. (93920 views)
Lloyd R. Belthazar - Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 5:10 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (93976 views)
Gabrielle - Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 3:33 p.m.
- Re: The Mists of Avalon is pornography! (94133 views)
Miz - Sunday, August 5, 2001, at 2:11 p.m.
|
|
|
|
