|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Shouldn't we call him Thomas Wander?
|
|
Shouldn't we call him Thomas Wander? |
Thursday, February 10, 2022 (5:11 a.m.) |
|---|
Given that the composer changed his name to Wander, or goes by that name professionally, and is credited as such on this recording?
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
Noah
(ppp-99-12-243-243.dsl.wlfrct.sbcg
lobal.net) 
In Response to:
↑ EoinC
Responses to this Comment:
↓ EoinC |
|
Re: Shouldn't we call him Thomas Wander? |
Thursday, February 10, 2022 (8:17 a.m.) |
|---|
> Given that the composer changed his name to Wander, or goes by that name
> professionally, and is credited as such on this recording?
Clemmensen has said that he uses 'Wanker' for database purposes but he references the name change in each new review. It is like IMDb.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
Re: Shouldn't we call him Thomas Wander? |
Thursday, February 10, 2022 (9:14 a.m.) |
|---|
He mentions the name change, yes, but then proceeds to ignore it and call him "Wanker" for the rest of the review.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
|
