|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: No way
Posted by: Milklos Herrmann Date: Wednesday, May 16, 2001, at 6:46 a.m.
IP Address: cacheflow-1.gcn.net.tw
In Response to:
Re: No way (Nater389)
> One should not judge a review on the small concept of spelling and your
> "grammar concepts." I have read many of your responses to
> faithful critics all over this review site, from "Gladiator," to
> the "Mummy." I have noticed, in all of your responses to people
> and their reviews, have been nothing but grammar correcting. This is a
> review page, is it not? If your not going to review anything, and just
> pester, get off the site. This is a page for reviews. And by the way, I
> agree greatly with my friend that you so dissaprove of. Jerry Goldsmith's
> original "Mummy," was another work of art. I have heard,and
> enjoyed, many pieces from the feat.
You can say that again.
Well,a review of anger is not a real review.
Jerry Goldsmith is surely an artist,and we've enjoyed his work all the time.
Alan Silvestri is a composer who is going on the same way.
Agree?
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- No way (5716 views)
goldsmith_fan - Thursday, May 3, 2001, at 3:03 p.m.
- Re: No way (5473 views)
Patrick - Tuesday, June 12, 2001, at 10:19 p.m.
- Re: No way (5356 views)
Eric Michaels - Friday, May 4, 2001, at 8:01 p.m.
- Re: No way (5289 views)
Nater389 - Friday, May 4, 2001, at 10:42 p.m.
-
Re: No way (5329 views)
Milklos Herrmann - Wednesday, May 16, 2001, at 6:46 a.m.
- Re: No way (5196 views)
Nate Jackson - Thursday, May 17, 2001, at 3:40 p.m.
- Re: No way (5221 views)
Van de Laak - Tuesday, May 8, 2001, at 3:10 a.m.
|
|
|