What the hell???

IS something WRONG in your personal life that you have to review ONLY GOLDSMITH AND HORNER? Personal favorites of yours, I take it?
Do you have to subject us to it?
You know, I have personal favorites, but I keep them to myself.

You're changing the dynamic of this site, you know. Keep this up, and people just won't bother coming around anymore. I don't need to waste my time going to a Horner and Goldsmith Appreciation site. Might as well change your name...

I know I won't be coming back...BYe! Soundtrack.net awaits!

right, while soundtrack.net gains more and more popularity, filmtracks.com is losing it. Christian, what's wrong with you buddy? I have been reading your reviews for several years now and now you're making reviews of scores you rate with max 2-3 stars. Scores, that expect Horner or Goldsmith fanatics, everyone else should avoid. I am a Horner/Goldsmith fan, but I buy only scores by them that I like. I think you should stop digging out "old times" scores and focus on the current ones. You're making me to boycot this site, really!!!

> What the hell???

> IS something WRONG in your personal life that you have to review ONLY
> GOLDSMITH AND HORNER? Personal favorites of yours, I take it? Do you
> have to subject us to it? You know, I have personal favorites, but I
> keep them to myself.

> You're changing the dynamic of this site, you know. Keep this up, and
> people just won't bother coming around anymore. I don't need to waste my
> time going to a Horner and Goldsmith Appreciation site. Might as well
> change your name...

> I know I won't be coming back...BYe! Soundtrack.net awaits!

> right, while soundtrack.net gains more and more popularity, filmtracks.com
> is losing it. Christian, what's wrong with you buddy? I have been reading
> your reviews for several years now and now you're making reviews of scores
> you rate with max 2-3 stars. Scores, that expect Horner or Goldsmith
> fanatics, everyone else should avoid. I am a Horner/Goldsmith fan, but I
> buy only scores by them that I like. I think you should stop digging out
> "old times" scores and focus on the current ones. You're making
> me to boycot this site, really!!!
Do you
You know, I have personal
> favorites, but I

Here is why there havn't been any new reviews. Hopfully these will ansewer your questions and we can get back to talking about film scores and not constantly complaining.

http://www.filmtracks.com/scoreboard/main.cgi?read=147366

http://www.filmtracks.com/scoreboard/main.cgi?read=147377

Do you
You know, I have personal

> Here is why there havn't been any new reviews. Hopfully these will ansewer
> your questions and we can get back to talking about film scores and not
> constantly complaining.

> http://www.filmtracks.com/scoreboard/main.cgi?read=147366
> http://www.filmtracks.com/scoreboard/main.cgi?read=147377

well, instead of rewriting reviews for older scores, he could use the time to write reviews for current scores, couldn't he? He rated alsmost all scores with 2-3 stars. Scores that are out of print etc. This is what I don't get. He's been upgading his house etc. Fine, I got no problem with that. But my purchse of scores depends on his judgement, on his reviews, but most of all on the comments of film music fans. If there are no reviews, there are no commets and I have nothing new to listen to.

> Do you
You know, I have personal

> well, instead of rewriting reviews for older scores, he could use the time
> to write reviews for current scores, couldn't he? He rated alsmost all
> scores with 2-3 stars. Scores that are out of print etc. This is what I
> don't get. He's been upgading his house etc. Fine, I got no problem with
> that. But my purchse of scores depends on his judgement, on his reviews,
> but most of all on the comments of film music fans. If there are no
> reviews, there are no commets and I have nothing new to listen to.

futher more, I'm not willing to buy scores with 2-3 stars ratings, scores that are out of print.

> Do you
You know, I have personal

> well, instead of rewriting reviews for older scores, he could use the time
> to write reviews for current scores, couldn't he? He rated alsmost all
> scores with 2-3 stars. Scores that are out of print etc. This is what I
> don't get. He's been upgading his house etc. Fine, I got no problem with
> that. But my purchse of scores depends on his judgement, on his reviews,
> but most of all on the comments of film music fans. If there are no
> reviews, there are no commets and I have nothing new to listen to.

Actually these old reviews were written a while back, check the copy write at the bottom of the page. Clem has set them automatically update the main page so we could can have some reviews to read, than rather nothing to read at all.