its amazing every time u post a comment that challenges official history, how many ridiculous replies u get that dont even make sense.

In reply 2 my last comment, someone said scholars have now determined that jesus did exist, and went through the torture that he did and yet there is no evidence to suggest that jesus even existed!

More open minded scholars today are questioning the existence of jesus and have more evidence to prove he didnt exist, than that he did exist or even the fact that he existed but was never crucified which is my own opinion.

One thing is for sure, jesus was not a son of God, that part has been manufactured by people who re-wrote the bible over and over again and now contains thousands of errors. yup, the bible was a true book of religion at one point, but since the arrrival of st james bible, there is hugely compelling evidence that the bible has been doctored by a cult known as freemasons. As a result most of the popes in the us and europe are masonic, and secretly practise ritual without the outside world knowing.

Another thing is time. the calender isnt what it used to be, its been changed because there used to be a 13th month before the great cataclysms that struck the earth some time ago. if jesus did exist, its impossible he was born 2000 years ago, its just a manufactured date that those beurucats in suites want u 2 believe.

How can anyone today be sure of his existence, we werent there to see him and have no record of him, so how do we know anything.

In my own view, im certain jesus did exist but i doubt he was crucified. The story of crucifixion of jesus has been so drilled into people, that they accept it without question and it makes a great story, but that shouldnt be the basis for truth.

Thank You.