Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
     1. Da 5 Bloods
    2. Scoob!
   3. Extraction
  4. The Willoughbys
 5. Spenser Confidential
6. Onward

       1. Godzilla: King of the Monsters
      2. Romeo and Juliet
     3. The Monkey King
    4. John Williams in Vienna
   5. Space Battleship Yamato
  6. Willow
 7. Ready Player One
8. Ghostbusters
         1. How to Train Your Dragon
        2. Nightmare Before Christmas
       3. Gladiator
      4. Alice in Wonderland
     5. Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
    6. Superman
   7. LOTR: Return of the King
  8. Titanic
 9. Raiders of the Lost Ark
10. Joker
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for The Passion of the Christ (John Debney)
Some anti-passion

Eric James
<Send E-Mail>

  Responses to this Comment:
Some anti-passion   Sunday, March 21, 2004 (12:43 a.m.) 

In response to the review, while the score heightened all the movie's imagery, I felt a lot of Debney's score seemed overdone. The intensity of the score itself without the movie seems rather heavy and too layered. I watched the movie and paid much attention to the score even before I purchased the CD. I felt perhaps the only thing that stuck out were the drum sequences (bongos, tomtoms, etc) which while accurately ethnic seemed to call out every other movie including the ones mentioned in the review, Gladiator, even cues from The World is Not Enough. And using voices and chorus seemed to extend the dialogue into other scenes which eventually got tiresome.
It also seemed each piece of music, each cue, didn't feel as if they melded together. Which from the review is because of a need to stay away from a central theme or focus which would seem to distance the movie's effect away from the viewer (as in, oh right this movie has this neat melodious theme I can hum on the way out). Emotional scenes were completely quiet and suddenly filled with a tumultuous pouring of harmony and progression. The fight in the forest and Mary running towards Jesus was where this was apparent. It just seemed when "life" seemed normal in the film, very intrusive and pounding music would just come out of nowhere suddenly to fill in the next scene with no introduction or prelude. This as a result seems to detract from the score's ability in my mind to match with the film. So I do agree with a lot of the negative reviews made in mainstream media. Debney's music IS marginalized to typical fare in his style of popping out within budget on time. Passion of the Christ is a movie which albeit artistic and nicely crafted, also is edited in a jumble and has no sense of progression which resulted in the music filling in quick moments with no identity with the rest of the score.

A final sidenote: As for two person's complaint's regarding "this is a devoted Christian... etc" I find this complaint to be invalid, really. I think the reviewer was just simply highlighting the fact that indeed this is the process in which this score was created. As the reviewer tends to do in many many other reviews, he likes to elaborate on how the composer brought us the product considering creating music is a variable interactive process.

And please leave other absolutely irrelevant conversations such as evolution out of these responses.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display

<Send E-Mail>

  In Response to:
Eric James

  Responses to this Comment:
Re: Some anti-passion   Monday, March 22, 2004 (12:09 a.m.) 

You're entitled to your opinion.

As for the complaint on the Christian score for a christian film...

I think that if you want to explain how Debney came about scoring the film a person should actually say HOW he became involved with the film. Debney wasn't the first composer chosen, so it's not like Gibson sought him because Debney was a Christian. Plus, that line is somewhat offensive because previously the question was asked if the film and subsequent score were Christian propaganda tools, and saying "This is a Christian score written by a Christian for a Christian audience" (or something like that) makes it sound like buzzers are going off saying "Warning! Christian crap! Listen at your own risk!" (not that Christian meant any of it the way it sounded, because Christian does have a lot of integrity, but this review was somewhat biased).

So yes, there is a valid basis for the complaints. If it were an athiest film and the review read "This is an athiest film for athiests by athiests", one might assume people were being warned, not educated.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display

<Send E-Mail>

  In Response to:
Re: Some anti-passion   Wednesday, November 24, 2004 (11:02 p.m.) 

Personally I think Scorehound is a demented blathering fool who couldn't hold a candlelight to Filmtracks. I hope your site blips out of eternity. Enough said!

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display

Copyright © 1998-2021, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.