look, a**hole, who gives a s*** about the whole punctuation and spelling, as long as their opinion and thoughts get through the world. and just because they're young sure as hell doesnt mean they dont know what they are talking about. and just as there might be girls reposting positive comments towards the mvoie and using different names, there is a possibility that there's an a** out there reposting their negative opinion towards the movie, too.

film tracks ratings don't lie, ur damn right, but they are only opinions, and everyone has different opinions, so there is no such thing as right or wrong. and just because your older (u seem to be) doesn't make you any right.

i loved the movie and im a proud fifteen year old fan of both play and movie and i know what the hell im saying. i completely respect all those people's comments and opinions, but i detest yours because it's just plain insulting. so, old or not, maybe you should think of what you're going to say before you come in here thinking you know what the hell you are saying.

and if there's someone out there that want to tell me how "right"/"wrong" (notice how i put quotations) i am, just email me. esp u curtis if you ever read this letter.

> I hope that people who find this Filmtracks review notice that Clemmensen
> and other people who find the new Phantom disappointing are articulating
> themselves very well. There are many very intelligent arguments being
> presented against the merits of the new Phantom recording.

> Then there are the fangirls, who seem to cause most of the favorable
> comments about the new Phantom here, and their English is poor, their
> opinions are badly uninformed, and they all sound like they're too young
> to know what the hell they are talking about. I think many of them are the
> same uneducated two or three girls posting over and over again without the
> guts to use their real name.

> Filmtracks' ratings don't lie. And Phantom of the Opera is getting the
> pounding it deserves in the polls.

> CB