|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Who do you believe: Filmtracks' 5000-word review? or the juvenile fangirls below? And not all of us Phantom fans love the movie. Indeed, many of us hate it, and find this review very perceptive (and no, we are not all Crawford fans).
The movie lacks all levels of depth which the stage show gives us, it entirely changes the characters, it is "Phantom Lite" made for an audience who require a "young and sexy" cast, and everything reduced to the level of a soap opera.
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- • Who do you believe: Filmtracks' 5000-word review? or the juvenile fangirls below? (10496 views)
Curtis Beaulieu - Thursday, February 24, 2005, at 6:45 p.m.
- Re: Who do you believe: Filmtracks' 5000-word review? or the juvenile fangirls below? (9752 views)
helen - Thursday, March 31, 2005, at 1:39 p.m.
- Re: Who do you believe: Filmtracks' 5000-word review? or the juvenile fangirls below? (9751 views)
Joyce - Friday, March 18, 2005, at 9:29 a.m.
-
Re: Who do you believe: Filmtracks' 5000-word review? or the juvenile fangirls below? (10085 views)
the christine of the opera - Sunday, March 13, 2005, at 7:51 p.m.
- Re: Who do you believe: Filmtracks' 5000-word review? or the juvenile fangirls below? (9911 views)
Elle - Saturday, March 5, 2005, at 3:18 p.m.
- Re: Who do you believe: Filmtracks' 5000-word review? or the juvenile fangirls below? (9995 views)
Giselle - Tuesday, March 1, 2005, at 8:49 p.m.
- Re: Who do you believe: Filmtracks' 5000-word review? or the juvenile fangirls below? (9905 views)
Linda - Saturday, February 26, 2005, at 7:11 a.m.
- Re: Who do you believe: Filmtracks' 5000-word review? or the juvenile fangirls below? (10087 views)
littlebarretts - Thursday, February 24, 2005, at 10:46 p.m.
|
|
|
|
