|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. > Just had to address the falsities of Clemmy's review and let everyone out
> there who has an open mind know that this is a superior recording to that
> of the original and I'm looking forward to watching the film for many
> decades to come.
I recently had the opportunity to listen to the older cast recording of PotO, and boy, it runs circles around the 2004 recording.
Being someone who has been in love with the older version of PotO, I, too, was quite disappointed by the 2004 version. True, its looks are stunning, but it has none of the charm of the older one. None whatsoever.
Also, Josh, and please don't misunderstand me... You always pound on Christian if he writes a review that isn't to your liking (this review, less than ****-reviews of Goldenthal and Randy Newman/Pixar scores), and paint him as this guy whose opinion is always flawed, but when he writes a review that -in your opinion- is spot-on, you sing his praises to no end.
You need to install some gray areas in your thought-process, my friend. It's not all black and white.
Tatata,
ck
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. (3310 views)
Jockolantern - Wednesday, January 26, 2005, at 11:55 a.m.
- Re: Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. (3027 views)
Shreenmie - Friday, July 29, 2005, at 9:17 a.m.
-
Re: Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. (3209 views)
Christian Kühn - Tuesday, April 5, 2005, at 11:34 a.m.
- Re: Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. (3222 views)
JP - Saturday, January 29, 2005, at 10:32 p.m.
- Re: Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. (3192 views)
Megan Pedersen - Thursday, January 27, 2005, at 11:40 a.m.
|
|
|
|