|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. > Just had to address the falsities of Clemmy's review and let everyone out
> there who has an open mind know that this is a superior recording to that
> of the original>
Agree with you there. Wonder what's with the man, ie Clemmy.
Good thing thousands did not listen to him.
He has ears that judges technicalities, but not emotions.
Sound Pitch and operatic voices may not appeal to the senses, when screened in movies. If the selling point is just a perfect voice, then Clemmy ought to just review operatic voices.
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. (3311 views)
Jockolantern - Wednesday, January 26, 2005, at 11:55 a.m.
-
Re: Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. (3028 views)
Shreenmie - Friday, July 29, 2005, at 9:17 a.m.
- Re: Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. (3209 views)
Christian Kühn - Tuesday, April 5, 2005, at 11:34 a.m.
- Re: Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. (3222 views)
JP - Saturday, January 29, 2005, at 10:32 p.m.
- Re: Once again, Clemmensen confuses and wrongly abuses. (3192 views)
Megan Pedersen - Thursday, January 27, 2005, at 11:40 a.m.
|
|
|