SUPPORT FILMTRACKS! WE EARN A
COMMISSION ON WHAT YOU BUY:
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
eBay
Amazon.ca
Glisten Effect
Editorial Reviews
Scoreboard Forum
Viewer Ratings
Composers
Awards
   NEWEST MAJOR REVIEWS:
     1. Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker
    2. Maleficent: Mistress of Evil
   3. The Addams Family
  4. Joker
 5. It: Chapter Two
6. The Lion King (2019)
   CURRENT MOST POPULAR REVIEWS:
         1. Gladiator
        2. Batman
       3. Nightmare Before Christmas
      4. Titanic
     5. Justice League
    6. Star Wars: The Last Jedi
   7. Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
  8. Maleficent
 9. Star Wars: The Force Awakens
10. Edward Scissorhands
Home Page
Menu Options ▼
Comments about the soundtrack for The Phantom of the Opera (Andrew Lloyd Webber)
Anyone else but Peter karrie

louise
(69.158.175.138)


  Responses to this Comment:
Beth
Anyone else but Peter karrie   Monday, February 7, 2005 (8:52 p.m.) 

I have seen clips from the movie Phantom of the opera. Gerard Butler isnt` bad but Emmy is just wonderful as Christine such a clear sweet voice. Someone said that Webber wanted to cast West End Star Peter Karrie at first, If this was true I am glad that Mr Webber came to his senses. Peter Karrie screams to much and over acts even though people may have not liked Mr Bulters performance I would rather see him than Peter Karrie anyone but Peter Karrie.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Beth
(ev1s-207-44-180-48.ev1servers.net)

  In Response to:
louise

  Responses to this Comment:
Annoyed
Louise
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Wednesday, February 23, 2005 (2:17 p.m.) 

Uh oh, it's Louise, who spends all day going around the internet attacking Peter Karrie because she and her daughter are ex-fans with a crazy grudge. Dear oh dear.


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Annoyed
(0-2pool130-155.nas28.salt-lake-ci
ty1.ut.us.da.qwest.net)

  In Response to:
Beth

  Responses to this Comment:
louise
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Wednesday, February 23, 2005 (4:35 p.m.) 

> Uh oh, it's Louise, who spends all day going around the internet attacking
> Peter Karrie because she and her daughter are ex-fans with a crazy grudge.
> Dear oh dear.

And not only that Beth, but these two also claim they *desperately* want to ahold of Peter so that they can talk to him - and yet, they go around and degrade/flame him all over the place? Ha! :p (And they truly/honestly expect him to be their friend, and viceversa, after they've pulled a stunt like this?? )

Sheeeesh! *shakes head* They don't make any sense!

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


louise
<Send E-Mail>
(cpe0050ba184a0b-cm0011ae02b3ca.cp
e.net.cable.rogers.com)

  In Response to:
Annoyed

  Responses to this Comment:
Annoyed
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Friday, February 25, 2005 (11:46 a.m.) 

Peter Karrie is a coward and hides behind his boot-licking fans
he is not man enough to face us and as I said before he screams to much and over acts.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Annoyed
(0-1pool139-16.nas28.salt-lake-cit
y1.ut.us.da.qwest.net)

  In Response to:
louise

  Responses to this Comment:
louise
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Friday, February 25, 2005 (7:16 p.m.) 

"screams to much and over acts."

Huh. Hypothetically speaking, it reminds me of someone else. (Namely you.)

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


louise
<Send E-Mail>
(cpe0050ba184a0b-cm0011ae02b3ca.cp
e.net.cable.rogers.com)

  In Response to:
Annoyed

  Responses to this Comment:
the christine of the opera
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Wednesday, March 2, 2005 (11:56 a.m.) 

> "screams to much and over acts."

> Huh. Hypothetically speaking, it reminds me of someone else. (Namely you.)

At least I dont` go around useing people to boost my self esteem !!

Peter is a


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


the christine of the opera
(adsl-217.146.110.206.merula.net)

  In Response to:
louise

  Responses to this Comment:
Louise
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Monday, March 7, 2005 (6:36 p.m.) 

> At least I dont` go around useing people to boost my self esteem !!

You just go around harassing them with a vindictive hate campaign on the web.


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Louise
<Send E-Mail>
(toronto-hse-ppp3883775.sympatico.
ca)

  In Response to:
the christine of the opera

  Responses to this Comment:
Annoyed
Andrea
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Wednesday, March 9, 2005 (8:46 a.m.) 

Lady you dont` know what your talking about.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Annoyed
(0-1pool138-26.nas28.salt-lake-cit
y1.ut.us.da.qwest.net)

  In Response to:
Louise

  Responses to this Comment:
olivemarie
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Wednesday, March 9, 2005 (11:35 p.m.) 

> Lady you dont` know what your talking about.

Oooooooh trust me, I think she does! And I know for a fact that what she just said is infact true because I seen it for myself!

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


olivemarie
<Send E-Mail>
(cpe0050ba184a0b-cm0011ae02b3ca.cp
e.net.cable.rogers.com)

  In Response to:
Annoyed

  Responses to this Comment:
Beth
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Thursday, March 10, 2005 (4:08 p.m.) 

> Oooooooh trust me, I think she does! And I know for a fact that what she
> just said is infact true because I seen it for myself!

Seen what for yourself?


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Beth
(ev1s-207-44-180-48.ev1servers.net)

  In Response to:
olivemarie

  Responses to this Comment:
Nony
Lou
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Saturday, March 19, 2005 (7:19 p.m.) 

> Seen what for yourself?

West End Star Peter Karrie's statement about harassment by Louise and Melanie Somers maybe?

http://www.peterkarrie.com/statementonolivemarie.html


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Nony
(cpe0050ba184a0b-cm0011ae02b3ca.cp
e.net.cable.rogers.com)

  In Response to:
Beth

  Responses to this Comment:
Caitlin
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Saturday, November 19, 2005 (7:41 p.m.) 

The statement is a fake. lol Christine Daae wanted Peter Karrie to notice her so much, she made up that statement with her lawyer brothers, and he still doesn't even know what's really going on. Christine Daae is now the internet laugh riot.



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Caitlin
(ppp-70-247-43-3.dsl.hstntx.swbell
.net)

  In Response to:
Nony

  Responses to this Comment:
Nony
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Monday, December 5, 2005 (1:34 a.m.) 

> The statement is a fake. lol Christine Daae wanted Peter Karrie to notice
> her so much, she made up that statement with her lawyer brothers, and he
> still doesn't even know what's really going on. Christine Daae is now the
> internet laugh riot.

>

you are such a crazy piece of work. why are you so jealous of Christine? is it because she has a job? because she works with Peter Karrie? because she is sane? or a combination of all three? lady, you need some serious help. you've been on this internet hate campaign for over a year, and have now turned your crazy stalking skills not only on Peter Karrie, but on some relatively unknown voice actor as well. YOU NEED HELP. PLEASE GET IT.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Nony
(202.41.167.246)

  In Response to:
Caitlin

  Responses to this Comment:
Christine
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Thursday, December 8, 2005 (5:38 p.m.) 

LOL!!!

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Christine
(adsl-217.146.110.206.merula.net)

  In Response to:
Nony

  Responses to this Comment:
Kat
neko
Stat
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Monday, February 27, 2006 (7:52 p.m.) 

Christine Daae's statement about Peter Karrie stalkers .

http://www.phantomoftheopera.com/cdaae/cdaae-statement.html



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Kat
(hse-hamilton-ppp210104.sympatico.
ca)

  In Response to:
Christine

  Responses to this Comment:
masked villain
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Sunday, March 5, 2006 (2:45 p.m.) 

http://www.ljdmeele.blogspot.com/

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


masked villain
<Send E-Mail>
(88-111-239-174.dynamic.dsl.as9105
.com)

  In Response to:
Kat

  Responses to this Comment:
BeeBee
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Sunday, April 16, 2006 (3:12 a.m.) 

> http://www.ljdmeele.blogspot.com/
im the son of Peter Karrie and i would just like to say i think that some of the people on this forum are sick, and need to stop typing such bull. i feel distain towards anyone who makes such empty, unfounded comments especially when they do not have the slightest conception of how to sing on a stage well. when you are better than my father on the stage then please pass on your criticism as you like but until then stop spouting where your not wanted.!-! peter would have been much better than the feller in the film, who couldn't act or sing well at all.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


BeeBee
(85.195.119.14)

  In Response to:
masked villain
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Wednesday, May 3, 2006 (4:36 p.m.) 

im the son of Peter Karrie and i would just like to say i think that some
> of the people on this forum are sick, and need to stop typing such
> bull!-!. i feel distain towards anyone who makes such empty, unfounded
> comments especially when they do not have the slightest conception of how
> to sing on a stage well. when you are better than my father on the stage
> then please pass on your criticism as you like but until then stop
> spouting where your not wanted.!-! peter would have been much better
> than the feller in the film, who couldn't act or sing well at all.

Don't worry Mr Karrie Jr, everyone knows that Melanie and Louise are sick in the head. They're obsessive psychotics.

Which of Peter's sons are you? Miss Melouise is already spouting off that you are a friend of his webmistress Christine's, because she is convinced that everyone who supports Peter is an automaton controlled by Christine.

How's your grandmother doing? I always liked her when I met her.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


neko
(cpe0050ba184a0b-cm0011ae02b3ca.cp
e.net.cable.rogers.com)

  In Response to:
Christine
The Real Peter Karrie   Friday, March 24, 2006 (9:43 p.m.) 

Concerning the Statement:

Despite the lies posted by his webmistress about my mother and I, in a libelous statement, we never received any papers from any lawyers of Peter, which is the only way the statement on his site could have been legal, as a professional lawyer told me last year. Statuary signature or not, without paper's, it is just another attempt on Daae's part to increase her popularity in the drama society. Not to mention, no legal statement has tiny wording at the bottom of the page, with different things about me, like liking cosplay and such, in a font almost white so you can barely see it, unless you try hard. That's completely childish, and unprofessional. It's only there to add more key words, so I can't have a life at all, without the statement there to discourage people. Though it never does, because once they look at it, they just shake their heads and ask if she was seeking professional help for her current state of mind.

Concerning the Webmistress:

Peter's webmistress Daae, claimed she never sunk as low as to post harassing things about my mother and I at message boards, but recently she was revealed to be another user called Gingersnapping, who joined in the LJ Drama attacks as well, but tried to hide her real self, in hopes of seeming like she did nothing wrong.

We also found an old email from Daae recently, in which she said very distasteful things about my grandmother, that was truly upsetting to our mourning family at the time, which she failed to post along with the rest of her emails on her site.

Concerning Young Women and Peter Karrie:

Peter always surrounds himself around young girls, from 8-18 usually, and though his fans claim it was planned, he even attempted to grab 19 year old Sarena Paton's butt during a Christmas Concert in a Holy Church in 2003. Fine if it's a woman around his age, and fine if it's not in a Chruch, but honestly ... Peter has even had a young woman as his stage partner, who likes to bare it all for money. Need I say more? No taste, totally vulgar and very disrespectful.

I am sad to say I am not the only victim of Peter. In a similar way, Peter attempted the same thing on Charlotte Church, to which a reviewer (with reliable sources) of the Peter Karrie and Friends Swansea Concert stated (according to his sources) that Church's parents had no idea that Peter was treating their daughter so friendly, and was trying to be a part of her family.

That review can be found on Charlotte's old Forum.

http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:1FwjD61aVcYJ:www.charlottechurchfans.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi%3Fubb%3Dget_topic%3Bf%3D15%3Bt%3D000204+Journey+to+Swansea:Tom%27s+Travels+&hl=en&gl=ca&ct=clnk&cd=1

Daddy Tom:

"Just a note on the Peter and Charlotte chat. Based on inside info I received later, this was not a planned part of the show and Charlotte was taken completely by surprise when Peter gave her a big fatherly hug and started asking questions. She fielded them with a lot of sometime, maybe, in the future, etc. type answers. She did talk a little about things she was trying in between songs as she normally does.

My source indicated that Peter's undieing fatherly love comments at the concert and in the Western Mail aricle were contrived by Peter without the Church family knowledge. They were not aware of that "close" relationship."

That is how Peter treated me, though I was only a 15 year old fan. On the phone in private he treated me like I was more then a fan and spoke kind words to me, that startled me, because I had no idea he seemed to feel that way. Said he always thought about me and worried if I was alright. He wanted to be part of the family. He never told my family though.

Peter's concert was also a setup for perverted and rich old men it seems, so they used the young and beautiful teenager Charlotte as eye candy:

Daddy Tom:

"One more quick note. The picture of Charlotte in the concert program is a poor representation of Charlotte as a person, I felt. I tossed it. It was strickly chosen as a device to lure rich old men to the concert (it may have worked) and really was of poor qualilty. The descriptive inforamtion with it was the standard list of her life story."

The most questionable though, is the famous video clip of him and Charlotte Church doing a duet of Phantom, and Peter looks as if he is trying to seduce a 12 year old girl.

Some of the fans who watched the video stated:

"That's much better... I prefer Distorted! Karrie to Pedophile! Karrie. (I just think he got into the role too much before, to tell you the truth.)"

"oh dear. I like CHarlotte church...but goodness, maybe she could do it better now cause shes matured. Thouhg i like his voice but the way he looks at her is just disturbing. O.o She looks just as terrified as i was."

"Haha....yeah. Either he's a really good actor, or.....ick."

"kinda makes me wonder if hes the other side of Micheal Jackson O.O wow....did ijust say that...sorry to all those who like micheal."

"hahah, it looked like that guy was having an orgasm at the end. gross."

They say a picture is worth a thousand words, and if a video clip can cause that reaction with that many fans of both, who were 'creeped out' as they say, then one should wonder why and how. I've seen many shows where an older man and a young girl have performed together, but none were as distasteful as seeing a man nearing 60 trying to seduce a child on a talk show.

The obsessed webmistress Daae also says, in an attempt to insult Charlotte, out of jealously and anger, for she obviously wished to be in Charlotte's shoes that night:

"I HATE THAT CLIP!!! It's a damn tragedy that the only video clip of Peter singing Phantom is with a bloody 12 year old on a chat show. It comes across really weird and creepy, she's crap in it, and he needs to be seen in costume and on stage... or at least in concert, where his transformation into the character even without costume or mask is amazing."

How can we forget that insulting her precious Peter can result in her not finding funny, what she usually would find funny, when mocking and trashing anyone else.

"How about sorry to the one who isn't an alleged pedophile??

Some things aren't very funny."

Poor Daae can't take it, but loves to dish it out.

I rest my case on that matter, and do hope that they both seek professional help.

This is not a statement, nor an attempt to harass these people. These are cold hard facts from fans alike, as well as I, and what I went through because of this performer and his obsessed webmistress, who harassed me and encouraged her friends and fans alike to harass me and try and invade my personal life. I have not and will not post anything personal, nor private as I respect everyone's IRL privacy.

Melanie



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Stat
(85.195.119.14)

  In Response to:
Christine
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Monday, May 15, 2006 (5:59 p.m.) 

> Christine Daae's statement about Peter Karrie stalkers .

> http://www.phantomoftheopera.com/cdaae/cdaae-statement.html

Peter Karrie's statement
regarding Louise and Melanie Somers ("olivemarie") and their allegations

I wish it to be known to whoever takes the time to read their diatribes, that I have never - repeat, never - had any association with this obviously mentally disturbed young lady other than as performer meets fan at the stage door (and I am always grateful to meet people who take the time to come to the stage door). I have no interest (and have never had any interest) in this girl in any way, shape or form; sexual, friendship, or whatever.

I catergorically and utterly refute all of their claims and accusations. The only reason Melanie Somers and her mother Louise persist with these outrageous claims is to attempt to blackmail me into calling them. They wish to speak with me personally, and believe that their threats and actions will cause me to call, as they have explicitly stated in many of their posts.

I also wish it to be known that Christine Daaé (Clemens), a very trusted and true friend, has kept me informed of all of the twists and turns of this unfortunate episode. She has been honest and true throughout, for which I am extremely grateful.

In an attempt to sort out this ridiculous situation, I had agreed that I would call Melanie from the theatre where I'm currently rehearsing. In the light of the viciousness of their recent statements and accusations, I do not see the point in doing so and have no wish to communicate with them whatsoever.


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Lou
(cpe0050ba184a0b-cm0011ae02b3ca.cp
e.net.cable.rogers.com)

  In Response to:
Beth

  Responses to this Comment:
Stat
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Monday, April 24, 2006 (9:41 a.m.) 

How many times have I told you guys the statement was a fake? Well now, here's the proof!

http://ca.geocities.com/ljdmeele/CAPT001.JPG
http://ca.geocities.com/ljdmeele/CAPT002.JPG

Christine Daa aka Victoria BOHM and Nicholas David Fredrick BOHM are RELATED. It looks like her DADDY signed the declaration so she could keep the statement up. The family tree I found proves it. Daae you are SO busted!
Proof?

http://www.peterkarrie.com/statutorydeclaration.jpg

Check out the signature.


Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Stat
(85.195.119.14)

  In Response to:
Lou
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Monday, May 15, 2006 (6:01 p.m.) 

This woman is an infamous crazy stalker.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Andrea
<Send E-Mail>
(c-68-60-174-147.hsd1.mi.comcast.n
et)

  In Response to:
Louise

  Responses to this Comment:
Mel
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Thursday, June 22, 2006 (8:45 p.m.) 

> Lady you dont` know what your talking about.
Some years ago, my husband and myself had the pleasure to meet Peter Karrie in Toronto. We returned several times to see POTO and saw him again. He was just a wonderful man, taking time to visit with his fans. Why anyone would want to attack him, I do not know. Perhaps this Louise had sexual fantasies about him (which would be easy to do given what an absolute doll he is). As for Peter and the film, Peter is extremely talented, but probably too old at this point for the film and his voice may not be smooth enough for the majority of the public. Regarding this Louise person, I am very tempted to gather all of this internet slander and offer to pursue litigation on behalf of Peter. Perhaps if she realizes that her assets could be seized and she may be forced to pay a large judgment, she might stop her actions. Internet slander is an action that can be responded to in court. I am a licensed attorney in both Michigan and Ontario. Others in my office are licensed in the remaining U.S. states and provinces in Canada. If I see another posting anywhere on the internet, I will contact Peter's website and offer my services at no cost.

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Mel
(74.12.1.56)

  In Response to:
Andrea

  Responses to this Comment:
AB
Re: Andrea the Sock Puppet   Saturday, August 12, 2006 (10:26 a.m.) 

> Some years ago, my husband and myself had the pleasure to meet Peter
> Karrie in Toronto. We returned several times to see POTO and saw him
> again. He was just a wonderful man, taking time to visit with his fans.
> Why anyone would want to attack him, I do not know. Perhaps this Louise
> had sexual fantasies about him (which would be easy to do given what an
> absolute doll he is). As for Peter and the film, Peter is extremely
> talented, but probably too old at this point for the film and his voice
> may not be smooth enough for the majority of the public. Regarding this
> Louise person, I am very tempted to gather all of this internet slander
> and offer to pursue litigation on behalf of Peter. Perhaps if she realizes
> that her assets could be seized and she may be forced to pay a large
> judgment, she might stop her actions. Internet slander is an action that
> can be responded to in court. I am a licensed attorney in both Michigan
> and Ontario. Others in my office are licensed in the remaining U.S. states
> and provinces in Canada. If I see another posting anywhere on the
> internet, I will contact Peter's website and offer my services at no cost.

blah ... blah ... blah ...

Oh, shove a large rod up your ass, sweetie. Check the date, too. I was going to keep quiet, but it's funny how you posted AFTER it was all over. Bring on your imaginary lawyers, my real ones would have a blast with you and your delusions, "Andrea". You sock puppets are saaad.

My mother can say what she wants, and if you don't like it, DEAL WITH IT, hun.

Stop beating a dead horse. I don't mind doing it, but you are just pathetic. XD

*rolls eyes*

-Melanie Somers

P.S

Oh, and please don't bother responding, because you'll only be talking to yourself.

I won, game over.



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


AB
<Send E-Mail>
(c-68-60-170-71.hsd1.mi.comcast.ne
t)

  In Response to:
Mel
Re: Andrea the Sock Puppet   Saturday, February 10, 2007 (6:28 p.m.) 

It has been a long time since all of these postings, but someone in Canada told me that the reason you were obsessed with Peter was becasue you never had a relationship with a man due to your unpleasant looking face and body. Sorry about that. Not all of us can be slim and beautiful.

> blah ... blah ... blah ...

> Oh, shove a large rod up your ass, sweetie. Check the date, too. I was
> going to keep quiet, but it's funny how you posted AFTER it was all over.
> Bring on your imaginary lawyers, my real ones would have a blast with you
> and your delusions, "Andrea". You sock puppets are saaad.

> My mother can say what she wants, and if you don't like it, DEAL WITH IT,
> hun.

> Stop beating a dead horse. I don't mind doing it, but you are just
> pathetic. XD

> *rolls eyes*

> -Melanie Somers

> P.S

> Oh, and please don't bother responding, because you'll only be talking to
> yourself.

> I won, game over.



Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Louise
<Send E-Mail>
(cpe0050ba184a0b-cm0011ae02b3ca.cp
e.net.cable.rogers.com)

  In Response to:
Beth

  Responses to this Comment:
Beth
Re: Anyone else but Peter karrie   Friday, February 25, 2005 (11:39 a.m.) 

Uh OH its` the ass kissing Karrie fans who have no taste in performers.

=

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display


Beth
(ev1s-207-44-180-48.ev1servers.net)

  In Response to:
Louise
This woman is a nutcase   Saturday, March 19, 2005 (7:46 a.m.) 

http://www.peterkarrie.com/statementonolivemarie.html

Peter Karrie's statement on Melanie and Louise Somers

I wish it to be known to whoever takes the time to read their diatribes, that I have never - repeat, never - had any association with this obviously mentally disturbed young lady other than as performer meets fan at the stage door (and I am always grateful to meet people who take the time to come to the stage door). I have no interest (and have never had any interest) in this girl in any way, shape or form; sexual, friendship, or whatever.

I catergorically and utterly refute all of their claims and accusations. The only reason Melanie Somers and her mother Louise persist with these outrageous claims is to attempt to blackmail me into calling them. They wish to speak with me personally, and believe that their threats and actions will cause me to call, as they have explicitly stated in many of their posts.

I also wish it to be known that Christine Daaé, a very trusted and true friend, has kept me informed of all of the twists and turns of this unfortunate episode. She has been honest and true throughout, for which I am extremely grateful.

In an attempt to sort out this ridiculous situation, I had agreed that I would call Melanie from the theatre where I'm currently rehearsing. In the light of the viciousness of their recent statements and accusations, I do not see the point in doing so and have no wish to communicate with them whatsoever.

If this maliciousness continues, I will employ a solicitor in Canada, and I will pursue Melanie and Louise until they make a statement admitting that there was no wrongdoing in my relationship with their daughter. I will be seeking a retraction and an exoneration at the highest level.

10:30 am, Thursday March 17th 2005

Post Full Response         Edit Post         Threaded display



Copyright © 1998-2020, Filmtracks Publications. All rights reserved.
The reviews and other textual content contained on the filmtracks.com site may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of Christian Clemmensen at Filmtracks Publications. Scoreboard created 7/24/98 and last updated 4/25/15.