|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: Probably the most simplistic score I ever heard... > And Zimmer is no exception. He's also evolving, just not in a direction
> that some people like. Though there are similarities in his scores, there
> are also clear distinctions between the musical choices Zimmer makes in
> the 2000's and those he made in 1990's.
Just because they are different it doesn´t mean they are better.
> Many of the composers who evolved in the past did so to the ire of
> establishments that had supported their earlier, more conventional works.
> And only long after their deaths were their later works accepted by the
> "experts".
Dont expect any expert in the area of musical composition to praise Zimmer´s work.
> It's interesting that Zimmer has developed a crossover appeal both with
> people who like big orchestral and choral works and with people who like
> rock (which I don't with only rare exceptions). Normally, the two don't
> see eye to eye on anything.
That´s very debatable. "People who like big orchestral and choral works" is a vague definition.
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- Probably the most simplistic score I ever heard... (36370 views)
Cesar - Wednesday, May 30, 2007, at 3:48 p.m.
- This will suffice: It's entertaining and haven't you heard Santaollala? *NM* (35939 views)
TUBA - Wednesday, June 13, 2007, at 4:18 p.m.
- No, it won´t. (35929 views)
Cesar - Thursday, June 14, 2007, at 12:30 a.m.
- Re: Probably the most simplistic score I ever heard... (35979 views)
mikko - Friday, June 1, 2007, at 8:13 a.m.
- Re: Probably the most simplistic score I ever heard... (36319 views)
Euphman - Wednesday, May 30, 2007, at 5:03 p.m.
|
|
|
|