|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Re: No, it won´t.
Posted by: G.K. Date: Saturday, June 16, 2007, at 6:29 a.m.
IP Address: pd9e5f660.dip.t-dialin.net
In Response to:
Re: No, it won´t. (TUBA)
> Actually, outside of the jack's action theme, past that point in the cue
> I'll contend that none of the theme are introduced exactly the same way.
> We go from the main theme weaving into the action theme from the first
> film (though certainly the best version this time, done in a different
> cadence and with a much fuller brass section) to the first variation on
> the Hoist the Colours theme that instead of fully rounding out plays the
> end of the main theme, then falls into the first film's action theme again
> before the love theme. These themes are certainly not
> "stacked"...in this track, they flow, and they flow wonderfully.
Of course they "flow wonderfully" because, as Cesar pointed out so fittingly in the post above, almost all the themes are based on the same harmonies and the same three notes. I'm not saying basing an entire arsenal of themes on three notes is per se bad, about a dozen or so themes of Howard Shore's LOTR are based on the same intervals, too. The thing is that Zimmer has zero ability to make this idea resonate or even remotely interesting.
> Didn't the plethora of woodwinds kind of surprise you? I was not ready for
> an oboe solo.
Yes, Zimmer writes an oboe solo (oboe/trumpet if you want to be precise), all bow to his versability! Come ON!
"Plethora of woodwinds"? My dear lad, woodwinds are an integral part to any fully orchestral work. The amount Zimmer incorporates here is average at best.
> Well, that's what happens when the moderator has an anti-zimmer cloud
> about him.
He has no anti Zimmer cloud, he's given Zimmer scores three and four stars often enough. Give me a break.
Comments in this Thread:
Expand >>
- Probably the most simplistic score I ever heard... (36372 views)
Cesar - Wednesday, May 30, 2007, at 3:48 p.m.
- This will suffice: It's entertaining and haven't you heard Santaollala? *NM* (35942 views)
TUBA - Wednesday, June 13, 2007, at 4:18 p.m.
- No, it won´t. (35931 views)
Cesar - Thursday, June 14, 2007, at 12:30 a.m.
- Re: No, it won´t. (35841 views)
TUBA - Thursday, June 14, 2007, at 7:43 a.m.
- Re: No, it won´t. (35880 views)
Cesar - Thursday, June 14, 2007, at 2:25 p.m.
- Re: No, it won´t. (35815 views)
TUBA - Friday, June 15, 2007, at 7:16 p.m.
- Re: No, it won´t. (35824 views)
zimmerfan1 - Friday, June 15, 2007, at 4:52 a.m.
- Re: No, it won´t. (35745 views)
Cesar - Friday, June 15, 2007, at 7:26 a.m.
- Re: No, it won´t. (35729 views)
G.K. - Friday, June 15, 2007, at 7:14 a.m.
- Re: No, it won´t. (35620 views)
TUBA - Friday, June 15, 2007, at 7:25 p.m.
-
Re: No, it won´t. (35608 views)
G.K. - Saturday, June 16, 2007, at 6:29 a.m.
- Re: No, it won´t. (35697 views)
zimmerfan1 - Friday, June 15, 2007, at 9:46 a.m.
- Re: Probably the most simplistic score I ever heard... (35981 views)
mikko - Friday, June 1, 2007, at 8:13 a.m.
- Re: Probably the most simplistic score I ever heard... (36321 views)
Euphman - Wednesday, May 30, 2007, at 5:03 p.m.
|
|
|
|