> Well, in the end it doesn't matter, we love it, and you don't. But don't
> ever f****ng compare Zimmer, or Soundtracks for that part, to those
> Pop-mistakes like Britney and all.

Did you read my post? Read it carefully.

> Music for movies are totally different things, and though you will always
> have better and worse soundtracks, there are above that

Fair enough.

> I like it because I find film music so complex, with all the layers, and
> now some of you are saying that Zimmer has no layers? Or few so that a kid
> can write it? I must say, I play all kinds of woodwinds, and I love to
> play along with soundtrack scores, preferably even Zimmer's (eg King
> Arthur, Last Samurai, Rangoon). But by playing I can tell you that it has
> great depth to it, because I can jump from one layer to the other, and
> while playing you find out how intertwined it is.

Thatīs great.

> Besides, his melodies may be very shallow (to you), but add all the rest,
> the brass coming in, the drums in the back, the choir placed on it, all to
> make it match... well I must say, no simple kid nor student could do that
> without knowledge, experience ānd talent.

Knowledge? Where did Zimmer studied? Whatīs the name of the last work he orchestrated? Why did he need so many ghost writers? A good student of composition has the knowledge to write things much more complex and diverse. Talent? Talent to write a tune like A B C, A B C?

> All I can conclude that there has come into being to great a hate towards
> Zimmer, because there are two camps who have found the fondness to bash on
> each other to show they are right. But I ask you, who don't like Zimmer's
> music, is it really that bad?, or is it just this score that bothers you?,
> or just his name, which has settles in your hate-part of your heart, while
> you know it's not worth it to hate him?

Spare me the silly victimizations. I have nothing against Zimmer in particular