|
|
|
|
|
Menu Options ▼
Review format
|
|
Review format |
Tuesday, March 4, 2003 (9:41 a.m.) |
|---|
First, I like the new format for the review, with the pro/con listed at the top. However, I couldn't help but notice that the gramar was so bad I caught myself wondering if this was written by someone for whom english was not their first language. Written too late at night, perhaps?
Anyway, being a fan of Armstrong, I'm hoping this will be a strong album.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
English Teacher
(cache-ra03.proxy.aol.com)
In Response to:
↑ Fraley
Responses to this Comment:
↓ Fraley |
|
Re: Review format |
Wednesday, March 5, 2003 (12:02 p.m.) |
|---|
Why don't you learn how to spell "grammar" before you criticize somebody else's writing. And by the way, English is spelled with a capital "E."
> First, I like the new format for the review, with the pro/con listed at
> the top. However, I couldn't help but notice that the gramar was so bad I
> caught myself wondering if this was written by someone for whom english
> was not their first language. Written too late at night, perhaps?
> Anyway, being a fan of Armstrong, I'm hoping this will be a strong album.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
Re: Review format |
Wednesday, March 26, 2003 (10:38 a.m.) |
|---|
> Why don't you learn how to spell "grammar" before you criticize
> somebody else's writing. And by the way, English is spelled with a capital
> "E."
Sigh. The zealot strikes again. So I mispelled a word. This forum doesn't have a spell-checker or an edit function. However, I'm pretty sure the reviewer had access to both. Anyway, it wasn't meant as a criticism, just an observation. I enjoy this site, and the information it provides, but that doesn't make Christian perfect.
Changing subjects, now that I have heard the score, I can say that it is indeed quite good.
|
Post Full Response
Edit Post
Threaded display
|
|
|
|
|