This is in the review:

"Schindler's List would ultimately overshadow the previous score with such an enormous memorable punch that Jurassic Park has come dangerously close to being classified as a "forgotten" or "underrated" score a dozen years later."

Where did the author of the review get that info!? I don't think anyone has forgotten Jurrasic Park for a second! I think Christian thought that himself and decided that his consensus was enough...!

> This is in the review:

> "Schindler's List would ultimately overshadow the previous score with
> such an enormous memorable punch that Jurassic Park has come dangerously
> close to being classified as a "forgotten" or
> "underrated" score a dozen years later."

> Where did the author of the review get that info!? I don't think anyone
> has forgotten Jurrasic Park for a second! I think Christian thought that
> himself and decided that his consensus was enough...!

he said dangerously close...he didn't say anyone forgotton it. Please understand the context before you criticize it/

> he said dangerously close...he didn't say anyone forgotton it. Please
> understand the context before you criticize it/

Even so, he overestimates how large a shadow Schindler's List cast over Jurassic Park. I'd argue they're equally recognized by society at large.

> Even so, he overestimates how large a shadow Schindler's List cast over
> Jurassic Park. I'd argue they're equally recognized by society at large.

Ahh, of course it'd be you to dig up my ancient (and largely naive) posts here!

In my defence, I will say that come awards season of 1993, nobody was thinking of Jurassic Park. And I think that's what CC was referring to in his review. Naturally, JP is a staple of the blockbuster industry. I don't think anyone could argue otherwise.